Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12972 items matching your search terms

  1. FD v WJ Ltd & LD Ltd [2015] NZDT 1465 (10 December 2015) [pdf, 147 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2015] NZDT 1465 APPLICANT FD RESPONDENT LD Limited SECOND RESPONDENT WJ Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 16 October 2013, FD purchased a truck cab and chassis from LD Ltd (LD), and immediately converted it into a motor home for private use. The purchase included...

  2. XX v TD [2024] NZDT 235 (7 February 2024) [pdf, 182 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 235 APPLICANT XX RESPONDENT TD The Tribunal orders: XX’s claim against TD is dismissed. Reasons 1. Between October 2020 and February 2022, the Applicant (XX) underwent Invisalign dental treatment with TD. The procedure was expected to take 2 years, however after 1 and a half years, XX came to believe that there was no improvemen...

  3. OO v SL [2024] NZDT 196 (19 January 2024) [pdf, 105 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 196 APPLICANT OO RESPONDENT SL The Tribunal orders: 1. SL is to pay OO the sum of $3,995.92 in full, on or before 5pm Friday 23 February 2024. Reasons: 2. In July 2022, OO said she had just finished an early morning shift at the [hospital] and was driving home along the motorway near [suburb], when SL’s vehicle hit her ve...

  4. ND v FD [2015] NZDT 1479 (19 March 2015) [pdf, 173 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2015] NZDT 1479 APPLICANT ND RESPONDENT FD The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On or about 17 September 2010, ND and FD, who were in a relationship, entered into a tenancy agreement to lease [property] from landlord EI. Approximately eleven months later, the relationship ended and ND...

  5. EN & ENE v UM & UMU [2017] NZDT 997 (10 Febrary 2017) [pdf, 79 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2017] NZDT 997 BETWEEN EN APPLICANT AND ENE SECOND APPLICANT AND UM RESPONDENT AND UMU SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 10 February 2017 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] In August of 2016, two young cows belonging to EN crossed the 80-year old post - wire and batten fence separating her property f...

  6. NS v L Ltd [2024] NZDT 5 (30 January 2024) [pdf, 122 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 5 APPLICANT NS RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reason 1. NS purchased 2 carrier vests online from the respondent and wished to return them saying they did not fit his requirements, by which he meant they did not properly fit. L Ltd denied the request saying the vests were the size shown in the adv...

  7. Lawson v Intended Defendant (Extension of Time to Commence Proceedings) [2023] NZHRRT 20 [pdf, 198 KB]

    ...Intended Defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 15 August 2023 DECISION OF DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON REJECTIONG APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS1 [1] The Tribunal received Miss Lawson’s claim on 9 March 2022, approximately 11 months after the Privacy Commissioner gave notice on 8 April 2021 that he intended not to take action on a complaint she had made to his office. Accordingly, a jurisdictional issue arises as Miss Lawson...

  8. [2010] NZCA 56 CA14/2010 Petersons Global Sales Ltd v PB Engineering Ltd Ors [pdf, 33 KB]

    ...seek interim relief or an order under s 215 referring the case back to the Employment Court to restore an order of the Employment Relations Authority, set aside by the Employment Court, to restrain the respondents’ use of intellectual property claimed by the applicants. [2] By s 214(1) an appeal to this Court lies only on the ground that the decision of the Employment Court was wrong in law. By subs (3) leave may be given only if the question of law is one that, by reason of it...

  9. [2024] NZEmpC 75 Opai v Commissioner of Police [pdf, 161 KB]

    MELISSA OPAI v THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE [2024] NZEmpC 75 [13 May 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 75 EMPC 116/2024 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MELISSA OPAI Plaintiff AND THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appear...

  10. Legal aid fee schedule for CMM [pdf, 185 KB]

    ...specified: request further initial disclosure from prosecution (after commencement of proceedings) receiving and reviewing further initial disclosure receiving and reviewing full disclosure (after not guilty plea, election, or first appearance) requesting additional disclosure interlocutory applications: o Application for address of witness or informant o Application for disclosure of information – s30 o Application for order setting conditions for viewing exhibit – s31...