12972 items matching your search terms
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2019] NZDT 1215 BETWEEN HX APPLICANT AND RC RESPONDENT Date of Order: 17 May 2019 Referee: Referee: J Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] Mr HX purchased a house from Mr RC in 2015, with ongoing repayments due to City Council under a “Home” programme attached to the property rates, and therefore payable by the new owner. [2]...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 155 APPLICANT SM RESPONDENT APPLICANT’S INSURER D Ltd GN The Tribunal orders: D Ltd is to pay $28,569.28 to SM on or before 7 June 2023; and D Ltd is to pay $1430.72 (being $1130.72 insured loss and $300.00 uninsured loss) directly to GN on or before 7 June 2023. Reasons 1. SM engaged D Ltd to carry out...
...HNZ was to be routed through Ms Chandler, a Consumer Engagement Manager employed by HNZ. HNZ’s evidence also addressed its reasons for believing that Dr Van Wey Lovatt had requested the change of address. Together with its evidence, HNZ filed an application seeking orders striking out Dr Van Wey Lovatt’s claim on the basis that it was vexatious, not brought in good faith, disclosed no reasonable cause of action and was an abuse of the process of the Tribunal. [6] On 15 November 20...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 155 APPLICANT UH RESPONDENT EN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. UH bought EN’s house at [address], by way of a sale and purchase agreement dated 17 May 2022. UH took possession of the house on or about 23 June 2022. About a month after that date, after a heavy rainfall, UH saw leaks in the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 226 APPLICANT SI RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. SI has income protection insurance with B Ltd. In April 2021 he injured his right foot during his job as a plumber. He visited a podiatrist over a number of months and carried on working as best he could. 2. The inju...
Notice to be heard on an interim harmful digital communications order to be made final R23 HARMFUL DIGITAL COMMUNCATIONS RULES 2016 When to use this form Use this form if you have received a ‘Notice to the Defendant’ from the court advising that an interim harmful digital communications order is issued to you and you wish to be heard on whether that interim order should be made final. In this form, tell us your reasons for applying and what facts you rely on to support this...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 139 APPLICANT TG RESPONDENT NNI The Tribunal orders: 1. This order replaces my order dated 26 July 2022 which recorded the Respondent’s name as NI. This spelling was advised by the Applicant and not commented on by the Respondent. The Applicant has now asked the spelling of the Respondent’s name be amended to NNI....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 821 APPLICANT ME RESPONDENT KT SECOND RESPONDENT EN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reason 1. In late 2022 ME purchased the property at [address] from KT and EN. ME is claiming $15,000 towards $42,000 she spent on drainage claiming this was a remedy available to her pursuant to clause 7.1(1)(d) of the Sale and...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 407 APPLICANT SD RESPONDENT W Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. X Ltd is added as a respondent party to the claim. 2. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. SD purchased airline tickets, through a [Travel Agent], for he and his family to travel to [Country] for a family holiday. Because of...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 596 APPLICANT TN RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. TN is not liable to N Ltd for their invoice [number redacted] of $428.16 dated 15 May 2023. N Ltd’s claim for payment of the invoice is dismissed. 2. TN’s claim to move the charging station is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In March 2021, TN purchased a [lawn mower] f...