Search Results

1. NN Ltd v FS [2021] NZDT 1403 (28 April 2021) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...for several reasons. EH replied that he would write the balance off. 7. On 10 December 2020, NN advised FS that he had reconsidered and sought payment of the outstanding amount. FS did not pay. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 5 8. NN claimed payment of the outstanding $2,051.28 plus $1,634 for interest at 2%/mth from 30 January 2020. In addition NN claimed $539.88 for 2 ½ hours time preparing for and attending the Tribunal hearing and $90 for the Tribunal filing fee. I...

2. UB v NC [2023] NZDT 628 (8 November 2023) [pdf, 141 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 628 APPLICANT UB RESPONDENT NC The Tribunal orders: NC is to pay to UB $2,697.50 on or before 5:00pm on Friday 22 December 2023. Reasons 1. UB lives next door to a property owned by NC and tenanted by NC’s daughter DE. On NC’s property there are many trees and plants. UB stated that the trees are overgrown and for many mo...

3. [2009] NZEmpC WC12/09 Stevenson V Bentan Twisted Ltd [pdf, 10 KB]

   STEVENSON V BENTAN TWISTED LTD WN WC 12/09 7 May 2009 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 12/09 WRC 10/09 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN SHAUN STEVENSON Applicant AND BENTAN TWISTED LIMITED Respondent Hearing: (Heard on the papers) 5 May 2009 Judgment: 7 May 2009 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C M SHAW [1] This is an unopposed application for leave to file a statement of claim out of time. [2] The a...

4. Steele v MSC 2018 Ltd (Removal of Stay and Extension of Time) [2020] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 467 KB]

   ...decision is to be cited as Steele v MSC 2018 Ltd (Removal of Stay and Extension of Time) [2020] NZHRRT 6] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2020] NZHRRT 6 2 Commission (Mr Steele had stated that the Commission “has been notified and a request made for mediation” and that the Tribunal order “mediation to occur by teleconference”). [2] On 16 May 2019 Mr Steele applied to have the stay lifted on grounds that the defendant had (allegedly) ignored “many” requests to m...

5. Moala v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 56 (29 April 2014) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: In person Complainant: In person Adviser: In person Date Issued: 29 April 2014 2 DECISION Preliminary [1] The complainant engaged the adviser to assist with a request for a visa; she was in New Zealand without a current visa and therefore illegally. The adviser submitted the request and Immigration New Zealand declined the request. [2] The complaint is that the adviser took some four months to lodge t...

6. BN v MH [2024] NZDT 102 (8 February 2024) [pdf, 93 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 102 APPLICANT BN RESPONDENT MH The Tribunal orders: Claim dismissed. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. BN and MH own rural properties on [Road]. The properties are divided by a river, and a strip of reserve land on either side of the river. BN farms his property. MH’s property is in forest. 2. BN purchased his prope...

7. SR v SP [2020] NZDT 1424 (28 July 2020) [pdf, 200 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1424 APPLICANT SR APPLICANT TR RESPONDENT SP SECOND RESPONDENT JX Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. SP is struck out as a party to the claim. 2. JX Ltd is to pay SR and TR, as trustees of the RX, $8505.00 on or before 12 August 2020. 3. Payment is to be made by way of direct credit to [reda...

8. BB v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 183 (27 March 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 183 APPLICANT BB RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. BB owns a property at [Address 1]. U Ltd owns the adjoining property at [Address 2]. 2. In January 2023, a storm damaged the fence on the boundary of [Address 1] and [Address 2]. BB claims the damage posed an imminent threat to his home and...

9. WS v KF [2023] NZDT 37 (13 February 2023).pdf [pdf, 193 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 37 APPLICANT WS RESPONDENT KF The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In November 2022, WS purchased a car from KF on [the Internet]. When WS took delivery of the car, he discovered there were dents and scratches on it and a taillight that needed to be replaced. He fixed some of these items and the...

10. QG v EK [2024] NZDT 737 (13 September 2024) [pdf, 177 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 737 APPLICANT QG RESPONDENT EK The Tribunal orders: EK is to pay QG $13,933.67 on or before Friday, 4 October 2024. Reasons: 1. QG claims that on 13 February 2024, she accepted a quote to redo her bathroom from EK who represented himself as a builder operating in the name of N Ltd. The agreed price was $38,180.00, excludi...