Search Results

1. Legal aid criminal procedure simplication project - proceeding steps [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...if a guilty plea is entered at or before the hearing Reporting to and invoicing Legal Aid Criminal Simplification Project Steps – August 2012 Page 8 Granting Notes Documentation Requirements Application for Criminal Legal Aid (LA form 1) [s14 Legal Services Act 2011] Criminal Legal Aid Amendment to Grant (LA form 2) [s28 Legal Services Act 2011] – if the time required for the step is expected to exceed the guideline hours stated Criminal Legal Aid Guilty Plea Tax I...

2. UC Ltd v BD Ltd [2024] NZDT 553 (9 July 2024) [pdf, 267 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 553 APPLICANT UC Limited RESPONDENT BD Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. UC Ltd was represented at the hearing by SX and BD Limited was represented by HT. 2. UC Ltd laid concrete supplied by BD Limited on a driveway of a property which was a development done by UC Ltd. UC Ltd says there w...

3. Sharko & Ors as Trustees of the Moata Trust [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for reconsideration dated 31 March 2010. The letter dated 4...

4. Sharko & Ors as Trustees of the Moata Trust [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for reconsideration dated 31 March 2010. The letter dated 4...

5. [2023] NZREADT 23 - ZI v CAC 2107 (17 August 2023).pdf [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...under the Housing Improvement Regulations 1947. [5] On 12 May 2023, the Committee issued its decision on the penalty orders. It reprimanded both the licensees and ordered the second respondent to pay a fine of $2,000. As for the appellant’s claim for compensation of more than $240,000, the Committee found it had no power to award compensation and it declined to refer the issue of compensation to the Tribunal as the unsatisfactory conduct was at the lower end of the scale and r...

6. ES v LQ & TQ [2023] NZDT 79 (16 March 2023) [pdf, 213 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 79 APPLICANT (And Cross- Respondent) ES RESPONDENT LQ SECOND RESPONDENT (And Cross- Applicant) TQ The Tribunal orders: 1. LQ and TQ are to pay $342.00 to ES on or before 6 April 2023. 2. The claim by TQ against ES is dismissed. REASONS Brief Details of Claims 1. In October 2021, ES purchased a tiny...

7. MW v Accident Compensation Corporation (Independance Allowance) [2022] NZACC 207 [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...JUDGMENT OF JUDGE DENESE HENARE [Independence Allowance Schedule 1 Part 4 Accident Insurance Act 1998; ss 48,51,52– Accident Compensation Act 2001] ___________________________________________________________________________ [1] The appellant claims that his independence allowance payable for a mental injury consequent on a physical injury should be backdated to the date of his physical injuries in 2000. The position of the Corporation is that the independence allowance has been p...

8. Wise v Commissioner of Police [2020] NZHRRT 44 [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...made redundant from the Police on 6 February 2015. After concluding her employment with the Police Ms Wise made a number of information privacy requests leading up to an information privacy request dated 19 June 2018 which is the subject of this claim. [2] Ms Wise did not receive a response to her information privacy request until 29 August 2019, which was after she had filed her claim in this Tribunal. 1 [This decision is to be cited...

9. N Ltd v P Ltd [2024] NZDT 751 (13 September 2024) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...rebate of $3,300.00 for disruption to its business. P Ltd disputes the claim. 2. The relevant provision in the lease is ‘Partial Destruction’ which says at 27.1 3. If the premises or any portion of the building of which the premises may form part shall be damaged but not so as to render the premises untenantable ... the landlord shall with all reasonable speed expend all the insurance moneys received by the landlord in respect of such damage towards repairing such damage or rein...

10. H Ltd v T Ltd & Ors [2023] NZDT 700 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 226 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 700 APPLICANT H Ltd RESPONDENT T Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT NX THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT B Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER (for T Ltd) XX The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. H Ltd were contracted by NX to build a house. NX contracted separately with B Ltd for the house plans. H Ltd contracted...