12990 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 302 APPLICANT QS RESPONDENT DG The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. OS is removed as an applicant party. Reasons: 1. The object of this dispute is a large seventy year old golden Elm tree that grew on a property that was owned by DG until May of this year when she sold her house. The tree...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 245 APPLICANT UW RESPONDENT GC Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. UW purchased a [boat] from GC Ltd on 12 May 2023 for $130,000.00. The boat was to be cleaned and serviced before delivery. 2. UW states he started an 8 week, $25,000.00, “cosmetic makeover” of the boat. UW identified a crack at...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 654 BETWEEN BD LIMITED APPLICANT AND YW RESPONDENT Date of Order: 28 November 2013 Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed Facts [1] The applicant claims $5,202.37 in respect of goods to the value of $3,917.17 supplied to ABC Limited (“ABC”, company number #####) during 2011 and interest and enforcement costs. The...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 146 APPLICANT HN RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed, and HN is ordered to pay $48 to N Ltd by 5pm on 19 July 2023. Reasons: 2. HN had an appointment to see a doctor at N Ltd on 14th June 2022 to obtain a driver’s medical certificate. The appointment went as planned where a few checks w...
...(the Directors). [3] Mr FL was an Authorised Financial Adviser whose advisory service was governed by the Financial Markets Authority and its rules, which included an obligation on Mr FL to keep client records. Mr FL’s position was that certain forms he had completed and made notes on, some of which were stored at the Company’s premises, were part of those client records. 2 [4] It appears that the arrangements between the company and Mr HJ included him transferring informati...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 255 APPLICANT SB RESPONDENT IK The Tribunal orders: 1. IK is to pay SB $529.00 on or before 4pm on 19 April 2024. Reasons: 2. In December 2023 the applicant purchased a vehicle via a private sale for $6,400.00 from the respondent who said he was selling it on behalf of another. The respondent organised for a mechanical check...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1605 APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT QX SECOND RESPONDENT TX THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT QG Ltd C/- LQ The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. QX and TX are jointly and severally liable to pay KD $8560.22 on or before 10 October 2019. 2. The claim against QG Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. KD provided contra...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 203 APPLICANT T Ltd RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. T Ltd used O Ltd to deliver goods, mostly polybins of chilled fish, to its customers in 2021 and 2022. 2. T Ltd claims compensation of $7814.30 (being the cost price of the goods only, no lost profit is claim...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1585 APPLICANT EZ RESPONDENT LH The Tribunal orders: 1. EZ’s claim against LH is dismissed. 2. LH’s claim against EZ is dismissed. Reasons: 1. EZ and LH were neighbours in adjacent properties in [Address 1] (owned by EZ) and [Address 2] (previously owned by LH). EZ lives on the high side of the two prope...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 541 APPLICANT TL RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: L Ltd is to pay directly to TL the sum of $2,050 on or before Tuesday, 30 July 2024. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Only the applicant appeared at the hearing. When I called the respondent on the number advised by the company call centre, [redacte...