12992 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 164 APPLICANT FZ RESPONDENT KU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Monty, a Labrador, was a family pet that lived with FZ. Monty developed a lump on his leg. He was taken to the veterinary clinic and after discussion, was operated on by KU and others to remove the lump. After the surg...
...plaintiff’s alleged reliance upon a letter of intent, a contract executed after he resigned employment, and a statement by his then supervisor. The representation by the supervisor is alleged to have promised payment of part or all of the sums claimed under the previous three claims. There is uncertainty as to remedies claimed under the fourth claim as no prayer for relief attaches to it. In addition a schedule is referred to in the body of the amended statement of claim but is n...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 500 APPLICANT SP RESPONDENT GC Ltd The Tribunal orders: GC Ltd is to pay SP $3,029.00 on or before 26 July 2024. Reasons: 1. In 2016 SP purchased a property, including a new build house, from GC Ltd. SP says that in February 2024 there was a leak from the ceiling in one of the bedrooms. He says the leak is caused by a defect in the...
Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 535 APPLICANT OD RESPONDENT TD The Tribunal orders: TD is to pay the sum of $2,840.00 to OD on or before Wednesday, 15 November 2023. REASONS 1. On 27 April 2022, the Applicant, OD, entered into a Residential Tenancy Agreement with [Property Management Company] to rent a four-bedroom property at [address] (“the Property”). The tenancy was fo...
...[1] This decision deals with an unopposed application to extend time for filing a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority). [2] The employment relationship problem investigated by the Authority involved a claim by the respondent for holiday pay which the applicant had withheld in reliance on a term of their employment agreement which provided that certain payments be forfeited if insufficient notice of resignation was given. In its determin...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1666 APPLICANT ID RESPONDENT KT The Tribunal orders: KT is to return the [Brand] vehicle, [Registration B] (previously registered as [Registration A]) to ID on or before 10 November 2021. If the vehicle is not returned to ID by that date, KT is to pay the sum of $3,000.00 to ID on or before 17 November 2021. Reasons:...
...jurisdiction of the Maori Land Court in subsection (1) applies to representation of a class or group of Maori in or for the purpose of (current or intended) proceedings, negotiations, consultations, allocations of property, or other matters. (3) A request for advice or an application for an order under subsection (1) is an application within the ordinary jurisdiction of the Maori Land Court, and the Maori Land Court has the power and authority to give advice and make determinatio...
...with Mr Ji having no contact with them. It is further alleged that this resulted in false documents being filed with Immigration New Zealand, so it is said he has also been negligent. [2] Additionally, Mr Ji declared on a number of application forms that he had “assisted the applicant with recording information on the form”, but as he did not directly work with the clients, it is contended the declaration was dishonest or misleading. [3] Mr Ji admits this conduct and theref...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 486 APPLICANT WC RESPONDENT HM The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. When WC moved in with her partner at [address] in February 2022, she formed a bond with a young white and ginger tabby tom cat who regularly visited her. She called him P and said the window was left open for him to come a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 388 APPLICANT DL RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 2. DL is seeking a refund of the hose reel she bought from D Ltd. The instructions that came with the reel were not clear and it broke in the process of being assembled and disassembled. D Ltd is disputing liabilit...