Search Results

1. [2007] NZEmpC AC 59/07 Paki v Panel Holdings Ltd [pdf, 18 KB]

   ...This interlocutory judgment deals with two issues. The first is whether Paania Paki should be entitled to prosecute her challenge to the determination of the Employment Relations Authority by a hearing de novo. The second issue deals with the application for leave to withdraw as counsel by Ms Paki’s lawyer. [2] After an investigation meeting on 5 July 2007 at which Panel Holdings Limited was represented by counsel, but there was no participation by Ms Paki, the Authority issued...

2. [2017] NZEnvC 125 Auckland Council v Mao Lau Jesus 2016 Co Ltd & Cao Cindy Property Management Ltd [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...Auckland Council is directed to serve Liansen Mao by: Auckland Council v Zhang & ors - ex p interim enforcement orders 2 (a) Delivering a physical copy of all of the enforcement order documentation (including the supporting affidavits) to 387 (formerly 423) Ormiston Road, Flat Bush. (b) Posting a physical copy of notice of the application to Mr Mao's address in China. (c) Posting a physical copy of notice of the application to PO Box 276138, Manukau City, Auckland....

3. RT Ltd v LC [2020] NZDT 1413 (27 July 2020) [pdf, 193 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1413 APPLICANT RT Ltd RESPONDENT LC SECOND RESPONDENT NC The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. LC is to pay RT Ltd $711.32 on or before 13 August 2020. 2. NC is struck out as a respondent party to the claim. Reasons: 1. RT Ltd operates a wheel clamping and towing business. RT Ltd alleges it clamped a vehi...

4. LL v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 306 (24 April 2024) [pdf, 201 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 306 APPLICANT LL RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by LL against U Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. LL purchased some sound equipment via [purchase option] on the U Ltd website. The purchased items were paid for but never delivered. LL now brings a claim against U Ltd for $720.00. 2. LL attended the hearing but U Ltd did...

5. M Ltd v G Ltd [2024] NZDT 561 (24 July 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 561 APPLICANT M Ltd RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: a) G Ltd is to pay M Ltd $16,080.34 within 30 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. In December 2022, M Ltd sold [a vehicle] to a customer in the [Region] area. Soon after, a fault was found and G Ltd was engaged to undertake repairs. The repairs were completed and...

6. LLC v ICQ [2012] NZIACDT 10 (28 March 2012) [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...the papers before the Tribunal. [17] The written agreement accurately identified the difficulties with a section 35A application. It is unsurprising that Ms ICQ would have a further oral discussion regarding the difficulties Ms LLC faced, as she claims. The record is not consistent with an adviser who was acting in ignorance, under a mistake, or misleading her client. [18] Ms LLC’s assertion that she was not informed finds no support in the contemporaneous record. [19] The fee cha...

7. AQ v ZJ [2014] NZDT 562 (16 April 2014) [pdf, 74 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 562 BETWEEN AQ APPLICANT AND ZJ RESPONDENT Date of Order: 16 April 2014 Referee: Referee Murphy ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the family name of the respondent is amended because the name was spelt incorrectly on the claim. The respondent (ZJ) is to pay the applicants (AQ) $1,405 by 5 May 2014. Facts [1] AQ (the applicants) and ZJ (the respondent) had a...

8. Xu v Tian [2018] NZIACDT 42 (26 October 2018) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...includes allegations that she did not initially tell Ms Xu that the visa had been declined, that she failed to inform Ms Xu of her unlawful presence in New Zealand, that she failed to obtain instructions and that she misrepresented the nature of an application Ms Xu signed. [2] Ms Tian admits she made mistakes, that she was negligent and that she breached the Code of Conduct, but denies being dishonest or misleading. The essential issue to consider is whether Ms Tian’s conduct...

9. EU v LX [2019] NZDT 1487 (23 October 2019) [pdf, 194 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1487 APPLICANT EU RESPONDENT LX The Tribunal hereby orders: LX is to pay the sum of $3,703.31 to EU on or before Wednesday 6 November 2019. Reasons: 1. In February 2014, LX and his former partner instructed EU to act on their behalf in relation to sale of a jointly owned property. LX’s share of the final...

10. Devon v Devon - Succession to Hone Ihaka Devon [2024] Chief Judge's MB 201 (2024 CJ 201) [pdf, 271 KB]

    ...2023/35 WĀHANGA Under Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Succession to Hone Ihaka Devon I WAENGA I A Between PETER PAITINI DEVON ALSO KNOWN AS HIMONE ARTHUR DEVON Te kaitono Applicant ME And CATHERINE DEVON, FRANCES DEVON, AGNES DEVON, HAYLEY DEVON AND SHARELENE STANLEY Ngā kaiurupare Respondents Nohoanga: Hearing 28 September 2023, 2023 Chief Judge’s MB 905-917 (Heard at Wel...