13005 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 221 APPLICANT Q Ltd RESPONDENT WO t/a AC The Tribunal orders: WO is to pay Q Ltd the total sum of $5,403.65 on or before Thursday 18 April 2024. Reasons: 1. At the request of the landlord BN, in June 2021 WO trading as AC engaged Q Ltd (the company) to oversee the interior fit out of its retail unit AC Restaurant, to help th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 736 APPLICANT XN RESPONDENT BP The Tribunal orders: BP is to pay XN $3,192.00 on or before Monday 15 January 2024. Reasons 1. XN said he traded in his [motor vehicle 1] to BP and upgraded to a [motor vehicle 2]. BP agreed to pay him $2,142 for the 2004 vehicle and sell him the [motor vehicle 2]for $7,458 so that the net effe...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 325 APPLICANT O Ltd RESPONDENT MX SECOND RESPONDENT V Ltd THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. U Ltd is removed as a respondent at the applicant’s request. 2. O Ltd is entitled to possession of the [car] and is therefore not liable to pay $4,500.00 to V Ltd purs...
...presumption in the Act that costs lie where they fall unless incurred unnecessarily as a result of either bad faith or allegations that are without substantial merit. [2] The first, second and fourth respondents to these proceedings filed applications for costs. The application by the first respondents (“the Slaters”) was dismissed in my substantive decision delivered on 17 April 2009. The costs applications by the second and fourth respondents were filed on 5 May 2009....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 425 APPLICANT NC RESPONDENT KU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. On 1 March 2023, NC purchased a [car] from KU for $2,500.00. NC says KU misrepresented the car in the process of selling it to him and claims $1,614.03 made up of $500.00 to re-register the car, $371.23 to fix th...
BRIDGET ZONNEVELD (LABOUR INSPECTOR) v MAUDAARA LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 155 [10 September 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 155 EMPC 238/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file a challenge out of time BETWEEN BRIDGET ZONNEVELD (LABOUR INSPECTOR) Applicant AND MAUDAARA LIMITED Respondent Hearing: (on the papers filed 7 September 2015) Counsel: A McIlroy, couns...
...Ted Nia. Each of these ancestors has been chosen because of their association with the Treaty as signatories, and be cause they come from opposite ends of Te Ika a Maui, encompassing the whole island. The carvings are in the tiki or waka koiwi form. It was the artists' intention to pay homage to that carving tra dition, as well as to show the continuing development of that particular style. The waka koiwi style was also selected by the artists because it captures the spiritu...
...Hawea/Wanaka Substitute land (being Section 2 of 5 Block XIV, Lower Wanaka SD) The Ngāi Tahu Claims Settlement Act 1998, Section 455(1); Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, Sections 29 and 113; and The Ngāi Tahu Deed of Settlement, Clause 15.6.2 Form 01 Rule 4.2, 16.1, 4.5, 10.9(2) For more information, email mlcsilna@justice.govt.nz WHAT IS THIS FORM FOR? This application form has been modified specifically for use in determining the successors for South Island Landless Natives...
...of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 154 APPLICANT NE and HE RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. The applicants obtained a quote from the respondent for a house removal. The quote was one of two obtained, and after negotiation, it was selected as the most cost effective. 2. The applicants verbally indicated their acceptance of the quote. A m...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 490 APPLICANT HL Ltd RESPONDENT AH The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. HL Ltd operates an inner city superette. The director, TA, said that on 15 July 2023 AH came into the store, and as he was serving her, her son’s scooter collided into one of the shop windows and damaged it. He cla...