13005 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1545 APPLICANT US Ltd RESPONDENT NH The Tribunal orders: US Ltd is to pay NH a total of $8000.00 on or before Thursday 30 September 2021. Reasons: 1. On 27 March 2021, NH engaged US Ltd to supply and install a new .55 gauge Maxx colour steel roof at [Road] for $10,600.00 including GST. This included new underl...
CLAIM NO: TRI-2007-101-000031 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN Timothy John Scott Claimants AND Bronwyn Hardaker First Respondent AND Eliot Sinclair &Partners Limited Second Respondent AND T J Hooper Third Respondent AND Christchurch City Council Fourth Respondent ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL Dated 4 October...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 758 APPLICANT NM APPLICANT TX RESPONDENT KC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NM and TX own a home in [City] which shares a boundary with the home owned by KC. In July 2022 NM and TX say they were approached by KC’s father who also lives at the adjacent property. They say [KC’s father] noted con
...[Road A] onto [Road B], [City] heading towards [suburb]. The two lanes on his side of the road merged to one. At around where the lanes merge the front of EL’s car collided with the driver’s door of MN‘s car 2. EL and his insurer, K Ltd, claim $8,615.04 for the repair costs to EL’s car. EL has paid the excess under his insurance policy ($500.00) and the remaining repair costs have been paid by K Ltd 3. The issues to be resolved are: a) Did MN fail to give way to EL? b) Did...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 58 APPLICANT FN RESPONDENT Y Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. This order replaces my order of 2 February 2024. 2. Y Ltd is to pay FN $2999.00 on or before 5pm on 12 March 2024. 3. FN is to return the laptop to Y Ltd on or before 5pm on 13 March 2024. Reasons 1. I made a typographical error in my order of 2 February 2024. T...
...notice and following up that the tenant had received notice, the Tenancy Tribunal ordered immediate termination of the tenancy on 2 July 2021, upholding that the proper 90 days’ notice had been given. 10. MW, QN Ltd’s property manager for the applicants’ property (until she left in late May 2021 and UJ took over) spoke at the hearing as a witness and stated that, in the first month after giving the tenant notice, she managed to talk to him in person once after multiple attempts a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 601 APPLICANT S Ltd RESPONDENT E Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. S Ltd’s application is dismissed. Reasons 2. On 2 November 2021, S Ltd was contacted by an employee of E Ltd and was asked to design and price a kitchen for a customer for whom E Ltd was building a home. On 22 November E Ltd followed up on the quotes. The design and...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 174 APPLICANT D Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT JD SECOND RESPONDENT WD The Tribunal orders, on the claim and counter-claim: JD and WD are jointly and severally liable to pay $1277.40 to D Ltd on or before 1 December 2022. Reasons 1. D Ltd supplied carpet to Mr and Mrs D in March 2019 for the upstairs and st...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 101 APPLICANT ND Ltd RESPONDENT TS Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT BG Ltd THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT SQ The Tribunal orders: 1. TS Ltd is to pay ND Ltd $2,040.00 on or before 12 May 2023. 2. The claims against BG Ltd and SQ are dismissed. Reasons: 1. ND Ltd hired a vehicle from TS Ltd. Durin...
...proceeding has needed to seek such leave. In my judgment of 15 March 2021, I granted leave to Mr Pan to bring a late non-de novo challenge.1 1 Juyi International Ltd v Pan [2021] NZEmpC 28. [3] I directed that Mr Pan file a statement of claim by 18 March 2021. That application was, ultimately, not opposed by Juyi. [4] Juyi’s statement of defence in respect of that claim was due on 24 March 2021. An attempt to take this step was not undertaken until the next day....