13005 items matching your search terms
LCRO 7/2012 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Wellington Standards Committee BETWEEN ND Of Auckland Applicant AND VC Of Auckland Respondent The names and indentifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] Mr ND (the Applicant) had sent an invoice to A for services rendered....
...The deduction was made pursuant to the provisions of s 70 of the Social Security Act 1964. Background [3] The appellant was granted New Zealand Superannuation at the Living Alone rate from 16 January 2014. We understand that at the time of her application she was in receipt of a Sickness Benefit and had been in receipt of this benefit since 2009. [4] As part of the application requirements the appellant was required to make an application for a pension from the United Kingdom, as she...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1347 APPLICANT MD RESPONDENT O Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. MD sent a computer to her daughter using a courier service through her employer. MD’s employer has a book of postal credits associated with the return of magazine ‘headers’ for audit purposes. MD sent the compu...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 846 APPLICANT M Ltd RESPONDENT KQ The Tribunal orders: KQ is to pay M Ltd the sum of $30,000.00 immediately. Reasons 1. This was a claim by the applicant for $30,000.00 against the respondent resulting from a construction contract entered into between the applicant M Ltd and a company C Ltd. 2. The respondent KQ was the sole direct...
...dealt with on the papers filed, and in light of oral submissions advanced during the course of a telephone conference on 4 February 2022. The three applications are: an application by the plaintiff for leave to amend their statement of claim; an application by the plaintiff to exclude a document from the bundle; and an application by the plaintiff to exclude two paragraphs from a witness’s brief of evidence on the basis that they contain inadmissible statements. I deal w...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 569 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT P Ltd The Tribunal orders: P Ltd is to pay $18,000.00 to D Ltd on or before 29 November 2023. Reasons 1. D Ltd supplied archaeology and heritage services in relation to a commercial property at [Address]. At the time D Ltd was engaged, excavation works were being undertaken at the property as p...
...in maintaining the deceit claim at and after the September 2009 settlement conference, despite his admission to Mr [RS] constitutes an attempt to pervert the course of justice and the Committee has not made any inquiries on that issue. (f) The request that a retired High Court Judge investigate the claim was justified because: 9 (i) The complaint was made against Mr [SY], a senior partner in a well-known law firm. (ii) The nature of the complaint and the background proceed...
...LCRO 127/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Canterbury-Westland Standards Committee 1 BETWEEN FD Of Auckland Applicant AND VG of Christchurch Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Application for review [1] In December 2009, Mr FD (the Applicant) complained...
...said it had not been posted nor had it been placed in an envelope. The Standards Committee informed the Practitioner accordingly. [4] The Practitioner wrote again to the Standards Committee on 15 June 2009 challenging the truthfulness of the Applicant‟s claim that she did not know how the document came to be in her letter box. He contended that she had found the document among her papers and had herself placed it there. He reiterated his earlier stance that the Applicant ha...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 792 APPLICANT BX FIRST RESPONDENT QD As trustee of the C Family Trust SECOND RESPONDENT KD As trustee of the C Family Trust THIRD RESPONDENT FC As trustee of the C Family Trust FOURTH RESPONDENT (if applicable) BN Ltd As trustee of the C Family Trust The Tribunal orders: The claim is...