13005 items matching your search terms
...VINCENT OLIVER v STUART DALE BIGGS [2024] NZEmpC 219 [19 November 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2024] NZEmpC 219 EMPC 261/2024 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a sanction AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file amended pleadings BETWEEN DARREN VINCENT OLIVER Plaintiff AND STUART DALE BIGGS Defendant Hearing: On the papers...
...Solicitors’ Letter. [12.5] The PMARS Letter. [12.6] The Counsellor’s First Response. 3 The counsellor in this case was a contracted provider with PMARS. PMARS and its contracted providers liaise with ACC case managers in connection with ACC claims processes. 4 These reasons are set out at [95] below. 5 Within the 20 working days by which a decision was required to have been made as to whether a request was to be granted under s 44(1) of the Privacy Act 1993 (PA). 4 [1...
...On Tuesday 14 June 2011, on the application of the defendant in WRC 8/09 (the fraud proceedings), I struck out all references to Mr Quigg or his firm Quigg Partners, Barristers & Solicitors, in the plaintiff’s second amended statement of claim dated 18 August 2010. The following are my reasons for so doing. [2] The second amended statement of claim in the fraud proceedings runs to 77 pages and contains also a schedule of changes made to the first amended statement of claim w...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1391 APPLICANT UB and DB RESPONDENT ND T/A ON The Tribunal orders: ND trading as ON is to pay $3078.88 to UB and DB on or before 19 November 2020. Reasons 1. In March 2018 DB contacted ND trading as ON to arrange marquee hire for her and her then- fiancee’s wedding at [Redacted] Beach, the total contract p...
...the plaintiff on the afternoon of Friday, 27 September 2013 for an order entering judgment in favour of the plaintiff. The grounds of the application were that the defendant had failed to file a statement of defence to an amended statement of claim filed in each of the above proceedings on 20 March 2013. After hearing argument, I gave a brief oral ruling against the plaintiff and I indicated that I would give my reasons later. I now do so. The background [2] In i...
...Judgment: 13 March 2020 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE K G SMITH (Applications to strike out part of the proceeding) [1] Zara’s Turkish Ltd has applied to strike out several causes of action in an amended statement of claim filed by Ibrahim and Güler Kocatürk. [2] The application is made on the basis that the Court does not have jurisdiction to consider the disputed pleadings, either because they fall outside s 187 of the Employment Relations Ac...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 1 APPLICANT C Ltd RESPONDENT KQ The Tribunal orders: KQ is to pay $2,500.00 to C Ltd by 3 April 2022. Reasons Is KQ liable for the insurance excess? 1. KQ contracted with C Ltd for staging of a house she was selling. Unfortunately goods supplied for the purpose were stolen during the staging. C...
...object under the law is to put the applicant in a position it would have been in had the damage not occurred. As a result, I find that XU Ltd is liable for the reasonable costs of repairing the damage caused to LC Ltd’s vehicle. Are the costs claimed for the repairs reasonable? 6. At the hearing, IU, motor vehicle assessor, was called to give evidence around details of and the reasonableness of the costs incurred in repairing the vehicle. IU confirmed that all the damage repaire...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 337 BETWEEN AEP APPLICANT AND ZVG LTD RESPONDENT Date of Order: 28 August 2013 Referee: Referee Edwards ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] AEP contracted ZVG Ltd to move her possessions in March 2013. The signed contract stated that the carriage was to be at “owner’s risk”. [2] Include...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 559 APPLICANT QD Ltd RESPONDENT SI APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. SI is to pay QD Ltd’s insurer J Ltd, $4543.05 on or before 30 November 2023. Reasons: 1. Mr X, a director of QD Ltd, and SI were involved in a motor vehicle collision. Mr X was reversing from a driveway into [road] and sa...