Search Results

1. NC v X Ltd [2024] NZDT 274 (10 May 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...their distribution warehouse may have records of batches received, there is no system to identify what batch was sold to a particular customer. KB stated this is the same for all retailers. I accept that as being likely and reasonable. 8. NC has claimed $12000 in compensation, this figure being based on the likely profits made by X Ltd on NC’s past orders. However without evidence to support a loss, the amount of compensation claimed cannot be justified. X Ltd have offered a gif...

2. DN v IL Ltd [2023] NZDT 644 (8 November 2023) [pdf, 200 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 644 APPLICANT DN RESPONDENT IL Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. This order is to be emailed and posted to the parties. Reasons: 3. In August 2020 DN purchased a spa pool (‘pool’) from IL Ltd. IL Ltd supplied DN with a replacement pump in August 2022 after it failed. 4. Several months la...

3. NC v K Ltd [2024] NZDT 603 (12 September 2024) [pdf, 186 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 603 APPLICANT NC RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by NC against K Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. In 2021 NC (the applicant) purchased a [laptop] from K Ltd (the respondent). In 2024 the laptop began to malfunction including freezing and not turning on. The applicant now brings a claim against the respondent for a refund...

4. KQ & WQ v EN & MN [2021] NZDT 1439 (27 April 2021) [pdf, 161 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1439 APPLICANT KQ & WQ RESPONDENT EN & MN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. EN and MN wanted to subdivide their property and sell two sections. KQ and WQ entered a contract with EN and MN to purchase a section, subject to subdivision. The agreement had a sunset clause that allowed EN

5. [2022] NZEmpC 81 Honeybunch Pure Naturals NZ Ltd v Niekerk [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 81 EMPC 420/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to strike-out proceeding BETWEEN HONEYBUNCH PURE NATURALS NZ LIMITED First Plaintiff AND LISA MARY JOLLY Second Plaintiff AND BARBARA-LEE (BARLEE) VAN NIEKERK Defendant Hearing: 16 Ma...

6. Chalecki v Accident Compensation Corporation (Entitlement to Vocational Rehabilitation Costs, Decision Capable of Review) [2023] NZACC 88 [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...expenses for which he sought reimbursement (aside from those connected with the self-employment grant, to which I will return). It was for Mr Chalecki to identify specific costs in relation to a particular venture and put that to the Corporation in a form which can be said to be a claim. [112] Mr Chalecki had numerous ideas over the years and sent financial information (forecasts and the like) of varying particularity to the Corporation, but I can identify no specific claim on whic...

7. CE v FG Ltd [2023] NZDT 333 (13 July 2023) [pdf, 100 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 333 APPLICANT CE RESPONDENT FG Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: Introduction: 1. CE and FG Ltd entered a contract in July of 2022. FG Ltd was to install a laminate floor in CE’s house. The laminate was to sit on top of the existing concrete floor. The total cost was to be $3835.80....

8. Van Den Bosch - Te Whiti South Lands Trust (2002) 55 Wairoa MB 280 (55 WAI 280) [pdf, 615 KB]

   ...rent means that over the three year term of the Smailes' lease the plaintiff received $13,876.98 plus GST less than under the former lease. The plaintiff attributes this reduction in rent to breaches of covenant by the defendants and this forms the basis for the claim. Hearing of Application A judicial conference between the parties was held on 27 July 2000. This dealt with procedural matters. The application was then set down for hearing on 30 November 2000 and is recorded a...

9. [2019] NZEnvC 107 Tonea Investments NZ Limited and Studio New Zealand Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 16 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Court: Submissions: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER IN RELATION TO BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC l'D9- of an application for access to Court documents by non-parties to this proceeding an application under s 311 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) TON EA INVESTMENTS (NZ) LIMITED AND STUDIO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (ENV-2019-AKL-000042) Applicants AUCKLAND COUNC...

10. [2025] NZLVT 10 - Donald v Hastings District Council (19 March 2025) [pdf, 240 KB]

    ...NZLVT 010 IN THE MATTER OF an application under s 80(3) of the Public Works Act 1981 AND an application under s 22(2) of the Land Valuation Proceedings Act 1948 BETWEEN IAN DONALD JANET STEVENSON PAUL STEVENSON (ENV-2024-AKL-000262) Claimants AND HASTINGS DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Tribunal: Judge M J L Dickey, Chairperson Hearing: On the papers, sitting alone pursuant to s 19(8) of the Land Valuation Proceedings Act 1948 Last case event: 21 February 2025...