13005 items matching your search terms
LCRO 209/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of [City] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN YH Applicant AND SM Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mrs YH has applied for a review of the determination by [City] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee) to t...
...Auckland, but he was unsuccessful. Mr Hill claims he did not get the job because of his disability, which is discrimination and a breach of the Human Rights Act 1993 (HRA). Pavlovich denies any breach of the HRA and says Mr Hill was unsuccessful in his application for other reasons. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Hill v Pavlovich Coachlines Ltd [2021] NZHRRT 43.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2021] NZHRRT 43 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 BACKGROUND [2] Mr...
1 [2013] NZWHT AUCKLAND 2 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6794: FENG QIANG LUAN – 14A Winstone Road, Mt Roskill ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Mr Luan is the owner of 14A Winstone Road, Mt Roskill. On 30 September 2011 he filed an application for an assessor’...
...ownership. Current owners of this land may apply to the Waitangi Tribunal to have the memorial on the Certificate of Title removed. Once the memorial is removed, the land is no longer liable to be 'resumed' and returned to Maori . Applications can be made to the Registrar of the Waitangi Tribunal under section 8D of the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975. There is no set application form. However, forms with details of required information are available from the Registrar....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 140 APPLICANT HJ Ltd RESPONDENT OI The Tribunal orders: 1. HJ Ltd’s claim is dismissed. 2. OI’s claim for costs is dismissed. Background 1. At the relevant time, HJ Ltd leased property adjacent to OI. Each party conducted small scale farming type activities on their respective properties. 2. On Sunday 26 Fe...
...adviser. [2.2] That licensed immigration adviser referred the client to Ms Ling, who could not see him at the time. He returned, and met with Mr Li. [2.3] Ms Ling had either no contact or limited contact with the complainant. Mr Li gathered information, and undertook the client engagement process. [2.4] Ms Ling used the information Mr Li gathered from the complainant to progress his immigration request. [2.5] When the Registrar received this complaint, she requested that Ms Ling pro...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 544 APPLICANT (Respondent in counterclaim) NS RESPONDENT (Applicant in counterclaim) TN SECOND RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: A. The claim by NS against C Ltd is dismissed. B. TN is to pay NS $1,465.40 by 12 August 2024. C. The claim by TN against NS is dismissed. Reasons 1. NS booked a bach run by TN...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehea...
...have a limited jurisdiction to extend the period in the case of incapacity or the debtor’s age (if under 18) but none of those exceptions apply in this case. No previous claim was filed by FQ in any other Court or Tribunal which would change the application of the limitation period, and I am not aware of any such claim being filed by RH. FQ advised that RH was in prison for some of the intervening time, but that is not an exception, and there is no bar on suing a person for a debt who...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1606 APPLICANT ST & CT RESPONDENT OU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. ST and CT travel frequently from [Location A] to [Location B]. 2. In the summer of 2019 / 20 (ST and CT could not recall the date) they were driving south on [The highway] when they noticed a ‘bang’ when the...