12996 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 167 APPLICANT TD RESPONDENT DJ Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. TD parked his 1996 Toyota Surf vehicle in the paid outdoor carpark at DJ Ltd’s premises on 19 August 2022. When he attempted to collect it on 23 August 2022 he discovered that it had been stolen. He claimed from his insurer...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1449 APPLICANT DC and SN RESPONDENT KH APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) AB Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. SN and KH were the drivers involved in a minor motor vehicle collision on a rural gravel road in March 2018. KH was reversing down a driveway when SN was...
...2014 SECOND INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A A COUCH [1] The history of this matter is summarised in my first interlocutory judgment dated 29 August 2013.1 [2] The plaintiff took that opportunity by filing a third amended statement of claim on 17 September 2013. The defendant very quickly responded with an application to strike out parts of that statement. It is that application to strike out which is decided in this judgment. In that decision, I made an order strik...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 320 APPLICANT EC RESPONDENT SX SECOND RESPONDENT HN The Tribunal orders: 1. HN is to return the [motorcycle 2] to EC on or before 24 August 2023. 2. SX and HN, jointly and severally, are to pay the sum of $2,345.00 to EC on or before 24 August 2023. Reasons: 1. For many years, EC stored belongings i...
...____________________________________________________________________ [1] At issue in this appeal are two decisions of the Corporation dated: [i] 28 June 2019, declining cover for a labral tear; and [ii] 15 August 2019, suspending entitlements on Ms N’s February 2019 claim. [2] Ms N also raises the issue of a possible deemed review in relation to a third review application dated 29 August 2019 that, in her submission, was not sent to review within the legislative timeframe....
ARTHUR UDOVENKO v OFFSHORE MARINE SERVICES (NZ) LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 174 [19 September 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 174 WRC 2/13 IN THE MATTER OF application for leave to file amended statement of claim BETWEEN ARTHUR UDOVENKO Plaintiff AND OFFSHORE MARINE SERVICES (NZ) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers filed by the plaintiff on 17 and 18 September 2013 and the defendant on 1...
...circumstances, when it is in the interests of justice to do so. [8] Rule 12 of the Rules specifies a range of matters that must be considered when determining an application for access. It provides: 12 Matters to be considered In determining a request for access under rule 11, the Judge must consider the nature of, and the reasons given for, the request and take into account each of the following matters that is relevant to the request or any objection to the request: (a) the o...
...kilometre. 2. By the time KG collected her luggage and arrived at the boarding gate, the door was shut and she was not permitted to board. As a consequence KG had to purchase a flight with a different airline for the price of (US) $559.94. She claimed to be compensated for that fare. 3. The issues to resolve the claim are: (a) Did VB Inc breach the contract? (b) If so, what loss can KG show she has incurred that she is entitled to be compensated for? Did VB Inc breac...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 805 APPLICANT C Ltd APPLICANT UC RESPONDENT BO APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. BO is to pay J Ltd $5,262.25 on or before 11 October 2024. 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 3 June 2022, UC was driving a [vehicle], owed by C Ltd, North along [Road], about five car lengths behin...