Search Results

1. [2022] NZACC 127 – ONeill v ACC (4 July 2022) [pdf, 308 KB]

   ...____________________________________________________________________ [1] The primary issue in this appeal is whether the reviewers were wrong to find that there were no reviewable decisions in respect of review numbers 6540240, 6599693, 6596703. A related issue is whether the appellant has a valid claim for cover for his right eye injury, and if so whether ACC has failed to make a decision on that claim within the statutory time frame. ACR 119/20 Background [2] Mr O’Neill h...

2. CK & NK v BG & HG [2023] NZDT 40 (19 October 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 40 APPLICANT CK APPLICANT NK RESPONDENT BG SECOND RESPONDENT HG The Tribunal orders: 1. HG is joined to the claim as second respondent. 2. BG and HG are to pay CK and NK $1,559.79 by Friday 10 November 2023. Reasons: 1. CK and NK and BG and HG, all attended the hearing by teleconference. 2. Desp...

3. DF v QT [2024] NZDT 474 (11 June 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 474 APPLICANT DF RESPONDENT QT The Tribunal orders: QT is to pay DF $3,785.00 by 5 July 2024. Background 1. DF and QT are neighbours. DF is a permanent resident in [Town]. She and her husband have lived at [address 1] for many years. QT and EJ own [address 2]. They purchased the property several years ago and use it as a holi...

4. HRRT Statement of reply [pdf, 386 KB]

   For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals The Human Rights Review Tribunal Page 1 For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals HRRT 06/09 - 4 Office use only: HRRT NoStatement of Reply What is this form for? Use this form if you are a named as a defendant in a ‘Statement of Claim’ and wish to file a ‘Statement of Reply’ in response to the allegations made against you. Important Information 1. Please print in CAPITAL LETTERS 2. It is important tha...

5. Lochead-MacMillan v AMI Insurance [2012] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...Act 1993 they contend that AMI failed to respond to their requests in a manner that complied with AMI’s responsibilities as an agency under the Privacy Act. Background [3] The fire occurred at the Lochead-MacMillan home on 9 January 2010. The claims on the house and household contents policies were notified to AMI the following day. On 22 January 2010 AMI engaged VFR Consulting Limited (VFR) to carry out initial investigations regarding the circumstances of the fire. Mr Neil McKa...

6. [2012] NZEmpC 85 Patel v Pegasus Stations Ltd [pdf, 46 KB]

   ...plaintiff in his amended statement of claim filed on 28 October 2011. The plaintiff’s de novo challenge is a defended matter and therefore requires a directions conference and the allocation of a fixture to deal with it. [3] If the plaintiff’s application amounted to a request for judgment by default it must therefore be dismissed. [4] The defendant has filed a memorandum accepting the plaintiff’s request that the directions conference take place with the plaintiff, i...

7. Family Fixed Fees Schedules July 2020 updated 28 October 22 [pdf, 482 KB]

   ...Taking instructions, attending the client • Preparing application for legal aid • Attempting to contact the client • Closing the file • Reporting to client • Reporting to and invoicing Ministry of Justice Note: This fee can only be claimed where initial instructions are not carried through and the file is closed prior to the completion of stage one of any proceedings. It cannot be claimed in conjunction with any other schedule. Application(s)/Order(s) Activity Fe...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 141 2Air NZ Ltd v Kerr [pdf, 88 KB]

   ...NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 141 [26 July 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 141 ARC 38/13 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for further disclosure, an application for leave to extend time to file briefs in reply, an application for leave to file an amended statement of claim BETWEEN AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Plaintiff AND GRANT KERR...

9. BC v KQ & EQ [2024] NZDT 146 (15 April 2024) [pdf, 193 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 146 APPLICANT BC RESPONDENT KQ SECOND RESPONDENT EQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. BC previously travelled through New Zealand. In June 2023, before departing New Zealand, BC sold a car to KQ. BC and KQ agreed a price of $4,900.00 and details of a [Money Services transmitte...

10. BG v TQ Ltd [2023] NZDT 145 (3 July 2023) [pdf, 175 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 145 APPLICANT BG RESPONDENT TQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: BG is to pay TQ Ltd $63.50 on or before 11 August 2023. Reasons: 1. BG received a parking breach notice charging her $65.00 by TQ Ltd (TQ LTD) for parking her car in the [mall] for 26 minutes without paying for her parking. BG has paid $1.50 to TQ LTD which...