12972 items matching your search terms
...TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 197 EMPC 384/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs on interlocutory applications BETWEEN ANDREW BYRNE Plaintiff AND COVERSTAFF RECRUITMENT GROUP LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Plaintiff in person D Brabant, counsel for defendant Judgme...
...2 July 2016 Adoption Proceedings under the Adoption Act 1955 Termination of instructions Activity Fees Tasks Initial instructions not followed through $290 For Taking instructions, attending the client Preparing application for legal aid Attempting to contact the client Closing the file Reporting to client Reporting to and invoicing Ministry of Justice Note: This fee can only be claimed where initial instructions are not carried th...
...2 July 2016 Adoption Proceedings under the Adoption Act 1955 Termination of instructions Activity Fees Tasks Initial instructions not followed through $290 For Taking instructions, attending the client Preparing application for legal aid Attempting to contact the client Closing the file Reporting to client Reporting to and invoicing Ministry of Justice Note: This fee can only be claimed where initial instructions are not carried th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 587 APPLICANT SD and QD RESPONDENT NU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. SD and QD purchased a motor vehicle in a private sale for $6800 from NU for their son. NU advised SD and QD that he was selling the vehicle on behalf of his parents as they had moved overseas indefinitely three months prior to
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 353 APPLICANT PR RESPONDENT Z Ltd The Tribunal orders: Z Ltd is to pay PR $7,039.08 by 30 June 2023. Reasons 1. PR claims a full refund of the fees he paid Z Ltd for his enrolment in a [Course] at its [City] campus last year. The amount PR claims is $7,821.20. 2. Z Ltd has emphasised PR did not make it clear...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 114 APPLICANT DI RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. C Ltd are ordered to pay DI a sum of $1005 by 5pm on 3 May 2024. Reasons: 2. On 22 October 2023, DI was looking for holiday accommodation in [Town] over Christmas and New Year period. He used C Ltd website and found a suitable property. DI says he attempted to book...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 309 APPLICANT DC RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal orders: KN is to pay DC $3,220.00 on or before 12 June 2023. Reasons 1. DC and her then partner KN, and CI signed a lease for [property], for a fixed lease until 25 June 2023. Each were to pay $230.00 per week as their share of the rent. On or about 8 February 2023, KN...
...to provide, and it failed deliberately to attend the investigation meeting. Although it did provide written comments to the Authority prior to the investigation meeting in a number of emails, no substantial supporting evidence in documentary form was supplied, and no sworn evidence was submitted. [5] Piefection Foods Limited, through its director, Mr Andrew McEwan, did not act in good faith towards Mr Ian Hume. It refused to communicate with Mr Hume's representative, re...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 498 APPLICANT IW RESPONDENT CZ APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) KJ Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. IW and CZ were the drivers involved in a motor vehicle collision, citybound on the [motorway] near/just after the [suburb] on-ramp. CZ was driving in the lane to the right of IW...
...Act 1993. The proceedings in HRRT040/2011 cited the “Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand” as defendant while the proceedings in HRRT041/2011 cited the “Civil Aviation Authority of England operating in New Zealand”. The statements of claim are, in part, almost identical. Neither are models of clarity and are difficult to follow. They have been understood as making complaints that the defendants breached: [2.1] Principle 6 of the information privacy principles in that the de...