12972 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 76 APPLICANT JI RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: N Ltd is to pay $4312.50 to JL on or before 14 July 2022. Reasons 1. On 8 March 2021 JI entered into a contract with N Ltd (‘N Ltd’) to purchase a house and land package for which a CCC was issued on 23 June 2021, with settlement between the parties...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 375 FIRST APPLICANTS DI SECOND APPLICANTS (new party) RESPONDENT KB G Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. KB is added to the claim as Second Applicant. 2. The claim by DI and KB against G Ltd is dismissed. REASONS 1. DI and KB (together referred to as “the Applican...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 358 APPLICANT X Ltd RESPONDENT LG The Tribunal orders: LG as trustee of LB is to pay X Ltd $6781.55 by 18 August 2023. Reasons Introduction: 1. X Ltd was contracted by LB trustees to provide forest operations and management services for the harvest of forestry at LB’s property at [address]. 2. X Ltd car...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 274 APPLICANT BT RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is to pay BT $1,469.30 on or before 14 July 2023. Reasons 1. BT purchased a [phone] online from T Ltd. He received the phone on 5 October 2022, and within a few days it was clear that the phone could not detect the pen or stylus as it was supposed to....
...needs to carry out remedial plumbing and tiling in order to replace the goods falls into the category of reasonably foreseeable losses that have resulted from the failure of guarantee. NC and CC provided evidence of those costs and the full amount claimed, apart from the Tribunal filing fee, which cannot be awarded, is to be paid by CD, being $1694.00. Referee: Date: 28 October 2020 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1384 APPLICANT EK RESPONDENT 2E Limited The Tribunal orders: 1. 2E Limited is to pay EK $503.28 on or before 16 December 2020. 2. Payment is to be by way of direct credit to redacted account number. Reasons: 1. EK purchased a refurbished IPhone 7plus for $699.99 on 18 August 2019 from 2E Limited “2E”. Th...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 224 APPLICANT IX RESPONDENT HG The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 2. On 1 January 2021, HG damaged the panels on IX’s car. IX is now seeking compensation for the cost of repairing the car. She is also seeking compensation for damage incurred when HG filled up the car with diesel. 3. The...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 96 APPLICANT LW RESPONDENT XE The Tribunal orders: The application is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 5 October 2022, LW purchased a 2006 [redacted] vehicle from XE for $6,300.00 after seeing it advertised on Trademe and then viewing the vehicle on 1 October 2022. The advertisement included the statement “[e]ngine warning l...