Search Results

1. G Transport v D Autos Ltd [2023] NZDT 689 (7 December 2023) [pdf, 175 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 689 APPLICANT G Transport Ltd RESPONDENT D Autos Ltd The Tribunal orders: D Autos is to pay directly to G Transport the sum of $10,275.76 on or before 31 January 2024. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. [2] The applicant seeks a refund of a $10,275.76 deposit...

2. BM & KM v L Ltd [2024] NZDT 475 (27 May 2024) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...APPLICANT BM APPLICANT KM RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: L Ltd is ordered to pay BM and KM the sum of $30,000.00. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 21 June 2024. Reasons: 1) In 2022 the applicants arranged for the respondent to remove their existing driveway and replace that. The applicants say that “within days of the new driveway being laid large parts of it failed.” The respondent returned and replaced about 2/3 of the dr...

3. DI v NI [2022] NZDT 251 (5 December 2022) [pdf, 214 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 251 APPLICANT DI RESPONDENT NI SECOND RESPONDENT TF The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NI and TF invited DI, NI’s brother, to move onto their rural property with his daughters at the start of covid lockdown. 2. The arrangement they made was that DI would build accommo...

4. LD v TP [2024] NZDT 368 (4 June 2024) [pdf, 236 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 368 APPLICANT LD RESPONDENT TP The Tribunal orders: Application dismissed. Reasons 1. The applicant is claiming the sum of $1,286.46 from the respondent for educational advocacy and decluttering services (see invoice). Education advocacy 2. The applicant is in business as an educational advocate. 3. She would for example, offer h...

5. [2013] NZEmpC 158 Gapuzan v Pratt & Whitney Air New Zealand Services t/a Christchurch Engine Centre [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A A COUCH [1] This judgment decides two interlocutory applications made by the defendant. The first is an application for security for costs. The second seeks an order striking out the second amended statement of claim. [2] These applications have been made in the course of proceedings which have been before the Court since 9 July 2012. In the 13 months since they were commenced, the proceedings have involved numerous interlocutory applications...

6. WHT - Guidelines for self represented respondents on documents required for hearing [pdf, 75 KB]

   Page 1 1 Response All respondents are required to file a written response to the claim. The response is not just a statement of defence. It should contain sufficient information to clearly inform the claimant and the other parties of the legal and factual basis of any disputes the respondent has with any part of the claims being made. It should also detail any defences and any claims being made against other parties. In particular, a response needs to set out:...

7. Family Legal Advice Service Operational Policy v1.9 September 2023 [pdf, 927 KB]

   ...of the Family Legal Advice Service (FLAS) which was established to enable the provision of initial advice and information for eligible parties disputing arrangements involving the care of their children. This service is one of the family justice reforms introduced in 2014 following a review of the Family Court. Family justice system The reforms to the family justice system were designed to encourage, support, and inform less adversarial resolution of Care of Children Act 2004 (CoCA) di...

8. [2019] NZEmpC 57 Cornish Truck & Van Ltd v Gildenhuys [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 57 EMPC 127/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN CORNISH TRUCK & VAN LIMITED Plaintiff AND BURGERT GILDENHUYS Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: M McGoldrick, counsel for plaintiff D Vinnicombe, a...

9. PDLA Operational Policy v3.1 [pdf, 350 KB]

   ...http://www.justice.govt.nz/ iii Contents Police Detention Legal Assistance Service 4 Introduction 4 Authority for the service 4 Responsibilities of PDLA providers 4 PDLA services 4 Attendance 4 Duties 5 Obtaining PDLA approval 5 Application 5 Experience and competence requirements 5 Approval 5 Rosters and lists 6 Legal aid case assignment as a result of PDLA 6 An exception to PAL 1 and 2 rotational assignments 6 Travel 7 Submitting invoices 7 Forms 7...

10. M Ltd v ON [2023] NZDT 389 (21 September 2023) [pdf, 113 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 389 APPLICANT M Ltd RESPONDENT ON The Tribunal orders: ON is to pay M Ltd $1,500.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] M Ltd, represented by director XC, purchased a small second hand digger from ON. XC says that ON misrepresented the condition of the digger, and claims compensation. [2] XC said that he saw the digger advertised...