12972 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 502 APPLICANT NP RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NP had a collision in her car, a [vehicle], in December 2023. NP had insured her car with B Ltd, who arranged for the repairs to be done. NP was due to collect her car after it had been repaired on 17 January 2024, but B Ltd advised her the rep...
...is the appellant’s child and that the Authority does not need to make a finding on this issue. He agreed that the only issue for determination is whether a birth certificate issued by BDM is required for the appellant to complete the benefit application process. Relevant law [9] The process of applying for a benefit is governed by s 11D of the Social Security Act 1964 (the Act):1 11D Application process for benefits 1 Replaced on 28 November 2018 by the Social Security...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1493 APPLICANT [City] Council RESPONDENT HL The Tribunal hereby orders: HL is to pay [City] Council the sum of $5,976.93 within 28 days of the date of this order. Reasons: 1. In the early hours of 19 August 2018 HL was driving his vehicle on [Street] [City] when he lost control of his vehicle and hit a traffic light pole located a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1603 APPLICANT XI RESPONDENT N Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. 1. In August 2016, XI had a pacemaker implanted in China, supplied by N Ltd China. In June - August 2020, she experienced health issues while she was visiting New Zealand (NZ). The decision was...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 212 APPLICANT NX RESPONDENT P Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] NX claims compensation of $375.00 from P Ltd, represented by QD and TD, managers, in its capacity as a manufacturer for what he considers is a breach of a consumer guarantee relating to a [car radio unit]. P Ltd denies liability....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 473 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT AB APPLICANT'S INSURER X Ltd The Tribunal orders: AB is to pay the sum of $30,000.00 to X Ltd on or before Friday 6 October 2023. Reasons: 1. On 5 May 2022, there was a collision between D Ltd’s [vehicle 1], driven by its director BM, and a [vehicle 2]. Both vehicles were usi...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 206 APPLICANT TU RESPONDENT CE SECOND RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim against CE is dismissed. 2. D Limited is to pay $26,081.92 to TU by 1 July 2023. 3. Immediately following payment of the $26,081.92, D Ltd will own the solar panels it supplied to TU and by arrangement m...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 98 APPLICANT KT APPLICANT MT RESPONDENT HT The Tribunal orders: HT is to pay $3,000.00 to KT and MT by the 6 April 2023. Reasons 1. HT was employed by a company, H Ltd which is owned by KT and MT. HT asked for a loan and an advance of $5000 was made by KT and MT from their personal funds. No payment date was...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 97 APPLICANT I Ltd RESPONDENT V Ltd The Tribunal orders: V Ltd is to pay $353.35 to I Ltd on or before 9 February 2024. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. V Ltd operates a business that supplies models for fashion shoots. I Ltd engaged a model (OB) through V Ltd for a photoshoot in [City 1] on 15-16 May 2023. OB flew fro...