12972 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 626 APPLICANTS And RESPONDENT In Counterclaim MD and ND RESPONDENT And APPLICANT In Counterclaim D Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. MD and ND are to pay D Ltd $816.25 by 10 August 2024. 2. Within 2 days of receiving payment, D Ltd is to release all photography and videos taken over the two days for MD and ND, to be s...
...JACKSON NZEmpC [2017] NZEmpC 38 [5 April 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 38 EMPC 135/2016 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for access to Court documents BETWEEN EDEN GROUP LIMITED Plaintiff AND TIMOTHY NIGEL JACKSON First Defendant AND PHILLIP ANDREW KITE Second Defendant AND CHRISTOPHER JOHN BLACKMAN Thi...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 205 APPLICANT MI Ltd RESPONDENT QD Ltd The Tribunal orders: MI Ltd’s claim against QD Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicant purchased a pilates reformer and tower from the respondent on Trade Me. The cost for the reformer was $4,300.00. The applicant claims the reformer bed was not in the condition it...
CLAIM FILE NO: 00765 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN NICOLE ODETTE MILLER-HARD Claimant AND MELANIE GAIL STEWART First Respondent AND ROBIN LAWRENCE FORD Second Respondent AND BAY BUILDING CERTIFIERS LIMITED Third Respondent AND No Fourth Respondent, the TAURANGA DISTRICT COUNCIL having been struck out. AND No Fifth Respondent, GEOFFREY MORRISON having been struck out...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 9 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 105 APPLICANT C Ltd RESPONDENT J Inc The Tribunal orders: 1. J Inc is to pay C Ltd $30,000.00 on or before 15 March 2024. 2. The counterclaim by J Inc is dismissed. Reasons: 1. J Inc leased premises in [City] from C Ltd. J Inc ran a [restaurant] under the name ”IU” from the premises for many years. The arrangement came to an...
LCRO 39/2012 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Standards Committee BETWEEN KV Applicant AND TE Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION [1] Mr KV has applied for a review of a decision by the Standards Committee in which the Committee decided that it was not necessary...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 281 APPLICANT LB RESPONDENT MX SECOND RESPONDENT BJ Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER BB Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 18 September 2022 LB was approaching the [roundabout], heading south. MX was driving in the same direction. LB claims that MX crossed into her la...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 641 APPLICANT GX RESPONDENT J Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. GX had insurance policies with [bank], underwritten by J Ltd. On 4 February 2024, the camper van driven GX broke down. As GX believed he had Roadside Assist insurance cover, he called [the bank’s] Roadside Assist line and advised the camper...
...Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the ruling of a Reviewer dated 14 April 2022. The Reviewer issued a procedural ruling in relation to Fulton Hogan’s decision dated 10 November 2021 declining Mr’s Coldrick’s request for physiotherapy. Background [2] On 25 February 2020, Mr Coldrick twisted his right knee while standing on a boulder at work. His GP, Dr McGuire, lodged a claim for cover for a sprain of the right knee/leg. On 27 March 2020, th...
...2024, the Court dismissed the application by Dr Van Wey Lovatt, for leave to appeal to the High Court from the Costs Decision of Judge Spiller dated 20 May 2024 (“the Application). The Accident Compensation Corporation (the Corporation) now claims costs on the Application. [2] The Corporation claims costs on a Category 2B scale in the sum of $2,674.00. Mr Evans, as counsel for the Corporation, submits that if this was an ordinary proceeding, there are factors that would have jus...