Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12972 items matching your search terms

  1. FU v IX [2024] NZDT 527 (2 August 2024) [pdf, 183 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 527 APPLICANT FU RESPONDENT IX The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. The applicant purchased a [puppy] from the respondent for $2,500.00 which sadly became ill, and was put down by her vet, within 2 weeks of purchase. 2. The applicant filed a claim seeking a refund for the purchase price of the puppy ($2,500) pl...

  2. [2021] NZEmpC 105 TPT Forests Ltd v Stronge [pdf, 189 KB]

    ...TPT FORESTS LIMITED v CRAIG PENFOLD [2021] NZEmpC 105 [8 July 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 105 EMPC 334/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for search order AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for access to court documents by The China Navigation Company PTE Ltd BETWEEN TPT FORESTS LIMITED First Applicant AND TPT GROUP LTD Second Ap...

  3. De Marco v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs on Appeal) [2025] NZACC 27 (17 February 2025) [pdf, 230 KB]

    ...___________________________________________________________________________ Introduction [1] On 25 November 2024, this Court issued a judgment in favour of the appellant.1 The Court directed that Ms de Marco was entitled to reasonable disbursements in the appeal. The first application [2] Ms de Marco lodged a claim for disbursements on 30 January 2025, outlining the aspects of improper conduct by the Corporation and certain medical practitioners engaged by the Corporation, that...

  4. Barnsdall [2011] NZWHT Auckland 11 [pdf, 80 KB]

    ...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. 2 [3] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: the application for review and attached submissions; the letter from Graha...

  5. XN v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 273 (20 June 2023) [pdf, 198 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 273 APPLICANT XN RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The hearing is dismissed. Reasons 1. XN asked C Ltd to service his vehicle. Some weeks later he was cleaning the car and found a broken part of the glove box, a hole near the back, on the right-hand side. He also found signs of glue around the hole. XN rec...

  6. NL & TG v JN [2024] NZDT 44 (12 January 2024) [pdf, 204 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 44 APPLICANT NL APPLICANT TG RESPONDENT JN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NL and TG live next door to a property that is co-owned by JN. 2. Their claim relates to problems with the behaviour of former occupants of that property, in particular that they threw rubbish over the fence onto NL and TG’s l...

  7. HM v F [2023] NZDT 445 (29 August 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 445 APPLICANT HM RESPONDENT F The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. HM is a member of the F [airline loyalty programme] under which a member may earn [loyalty points] (Points) when flying with F. She says on 31 December 2022 F cancelled 187,928 of her Points without any war...

  8. Gwak and Kim TRI-2020-100-006 Procedural Order 11 [pdf, 196 KB]

    IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2020-100-006 BETWEEN JUNG SOOK GWAK & JOSEPHINE YEON JU KIM Claimants AND YAN SUN First Respondent (Removed) AND ALASTAIR COUPER Second Respondent AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Third Respondent (Removed) AND LAI FOOK CHOY Fourth Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER 11 (Leave application by claimants) Dated 8 June 2023 2 Introduction [1] There was a telephone conference convened on this claim...

  9. EMPC Consolidated practice directions [pdf, 135 KB]

    ...statement of claim or statement of defence or other intended pleading, and an affidavit explaining the reasons for the delay and any mitigating factors or other relevant information bearing upon the grant or refusal of leave. A memorandum from the applicant’s representative addressing other relevant matters will also be appreciated by the Court. 7. Electronic filing Until the Court’s obligations under the Electronic Transactions Act 2002 and under the Judicature Modernisat...

  10. Reviewing legal aid decisions [pdf, 1.1 MB]

    ...• clearly unfair (‘manifestly unreasonable’) and/or • ‘wrong in law’. You can’t ask for a review just because you disagree with the decision. What decisions can the Tribunal review? The Tribunal can review decisions about: • applications and claims for legal aid, including declining your application • how much legal aid you can get • how much legal aid you may have to repay • the conditions of a legal aid grant • stopping or changing a grant • a charg...