Search Results

1. EQ v F Ltd [2023] NZDT 175 (27 June 2023) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...maintenance. A dispute arose about the repair invoice. F Ltd agreed to waive the $150.00 call out fee but have placed the balance of $427.50 with debt collectors. 2. EQ wants to cancel the contract and get a full refund of the $3,025.00 paid and requests an order that he not liable to pay the repair invoice of $427.50. 3. The issues to be resolved are: (a) Is EQ entitled to cancel the contract and get a refund of $3,025.00? (i) Was the treadmill of acceptable quality? (ii) If...

2. [2025] NZIACDT 06 – DH v Liu (14 January 2025) [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...WeChat text by ZA (the agent) who claimed to represent employers needing workers for recovery work following floods. Mr Liu replied quoting a fee of $800 for each application. [6] Mr Liu then provided the agent with a link to a questionnaire and requested that each applicant fill in their personal information. The complainant completed the questionnaire on 30 March 2023. [7] RM, an associate of the agent, provided a file of supporting documents concerning the complainant to Mr...

3. [2025] NZIACDT 05 – YI v Liu (14 January 2025) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...WeChat text by ZA (the agent) who claimed to represent employers needing workers for recovery work following floods. Mr Liu replied quoting a fee of $800 for each application. [6] Mr Liu then provided the agent with a link to a questionnaire and requested that each applicant fill in their personal information. The complainant completed the questionnaire on 7 March 2023. [7] RM, an associate of the agent, provided a file of supporting documents concerning the complainant to Mr...

4. Rafiq v Department of Internal Affairs [2013] NZHRRT 11 [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...Member REPRESENTATION: Mr R Rafiq in person (no appearance) Mr S Cohen-Ronen for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 12 and 13 April 2012 DATE OF DECISION: 8 April 2013 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL Introduction [1] On 9 November 2009 Mr Rafiq requested access to the personal information held about him by the Department of Internal Affairs. By letter dated 18 November 2009 the Department provided some information but other information was withheld pursuant to s 27(1)(c) of the Priv...

5. Edwards – Whakatōhea (2018) 183 Waiariki MB 169-194 (183 WAR 169) [pdf, 534 KB]

   ...Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Whakatōhea - an application for review of an order made pursuant to s 30, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 at 69 Opotiki MB 11-26 dated 2 February 1994 BETWEEN ADRIANA EDWARDS Applicant Hearing: 5-7 March 2018 (Heard at Ōhope) Coram: Appearances: Judge C T Coxhead (Presiding) K Prime H W Colbert C Hirschfeld, T Sinclar and B Tupara for the Applicant C Linkhorn, G Gilli...

6. DS v HW [2023] NZDT 550 (6 October 2023) [pdf, 190 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 550 APPLICANT DS RESPONDENT HW The Tribunal orders: 1) HW’s claim against DS is struck out. 2) DS’s claim against HW is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 10 April 2021, DS took his son’s motorbike engine to HW for repairs and parts. He said that the bike was working but jumped when it was kickstarted. He paid $800.00 to...

7. BY Ltd and BYB v YB and YBY [2015] NZDT 778 (5 May 2015) [pdf, 83 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2015] NZDT 778 BETWEEN BY LIMITED APPLICANT AND BYB SECOND APPLICANT AND YB RESPONDENT AND YBY SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 5 May 2015 Referee: Referee Smallholme ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim in relation to the legality of the drainage installed by BY Limited and BYB is struck out. The claim in relation to fencing costs and legal fees is...

8. LCRO 78/2019 EW v PT and AM (3 February 2021) [pdf, 142 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2021] NZLCRO 017 Ref: LCRO 78/2019 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of [AREA] Standards Committee X BETWEEN EW Applicant AND PT and AM Respondents The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr EW filed an Appli...

9. Rehearings, appeals & stay of proceedings

   ...Both the landlord and the tenant can apply for a rehearing. You have 5 working days after the decision is issued to apply for a rehearing.  You do not need to pay a filing fee. You can use this form to apply for a rehearing. You can submit your application at the District Court where the original hearing took place.  You can send your application by email, by courier, or post or you can take into the court in person. Court contact information, including physical and email address is a...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Tenancy

10. BU & SI v UQ & CQ [2024] NZDT 811 (20 December 2024) [pdf, 99 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 811 APPLICANT BU APPLICANT SI RESPONDENT UQ SECOND RESPONDENT CQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicants, BU and SI purchased [address] (“the house”) from the respondents, UQ and CQ. 2. A conditional offer was made on 19 March 2024 which included a condition that allowed for a...