12972 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 611 APPLICANT C Ltd RESPONDENT EN The Tribunal orders: EN is to pay C Ltd $1191.91 on or before the 12th day of December 2023. The money may be paid into account number [redacted]. Reasons: Introduction: 1. EN had entered into a contract with C Ltd on a 3G unlimited plan. 2. XX was the network owner and operator....
...scan, Austen would have to be put down. TD paid $5,000 to the vet. 5. The MRI scan revealed no sign of a dog bite, and that the partial paralysis Austen was suffering from was caused by a congenital condition, Syringomyelia, exacerbated by some form of trauma, such as a dog bite to the neck, a hard pull on a lead and possibly even Austen violently shaking himself. 6. The vet bills came to an additional $1,639.79 which, in view of the diagnosis, TD told the vet she would not pay....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1706 APPLICANT NP RESPONDENT KT The Tribunal orders: Under both claims NP is to pay KT $1,080.00 on or before 5.00pm on 9 November 2021 Reasons 1. NP contacted KT, an arborist trading as QUT, about tree work she wanted carried out at her property. The call was prompted by her concern that an elm tree, which was leaning over,...
...was to pay the remaining $1000 at a later date. 2. SW started having issues with the vehicle. She reported these to L Ltd and asked for their help. L Ltd responded but as it would not uplift the car and repair it at their cost, SW filed her claim in the Tribunal seeking to cancel the contract, payment of a full refund and associated costs, and for L Ltd to uplift the car. 3. The issues to be decided are: i. Has there been a breach of the guarantee of acceptable quality in the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 51 APPLICANT P Ltd RESPONDENT AH SECOND RESPONDENT LH The Tribunal orders: The claim by P Ltd against AH and LH is proved and AH and LH are to pay P Ltd $15,679.50 on or by 5:00pm on 28 February 2023. Reasons 1. On 08 January 2020, P Ltd entered into an agency agreement with AH and LH for the sale of a l...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 152 FIRST APPLICANT KI SECOND APPLICANT (new party) RESPONDENT GI Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. GI is added to the claim as Second Applicant. 2. Q Ltd is to pay to GI and KI the sum of $678.13 on or before Monday, 24 July 2023. The balance of the claim is dismissed. REASONS 1....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 8 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1640 APPLICANT IN and SC Trustees of M Trust RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 15 May 2012, IN and SC as trustees of M Trust (the “Trust”) purchased Unit Z at [address], [Suburb] in a unit title development from B Ltd (“the B Ltd”) in a mortgagee sale. IN h...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 240 APPLICANT TS APPLICANT AS RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: U Ltd is to pay TS and AS the sum of $139.89 on or before Wednesday 14 June 2023. Background 1. In November 2021, TS and AS purchased three tickets for a [band] concert to be held on [redacted] at a cost of $129.90 per ticket, as well as an additional sum of $29.97...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 224 APPLICANT N Ltd RESPONDENT TT The Tribunal orders: N Ltd’s claim against TT is struck out. Reasons: 1. At the hearing the respondent said he had no notice of the hearing. The respondent also said the matter was heard before the Tribunal in June 2021 under [file number redacted] and that the matter was dismis...