12972 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 565 APPLICANT KS APPLICANT TC RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: M Ltd is to pay TC and KS $2,801.00 on or before 26 August 2024. Reasons 1. In November 2023, KS and TC entered into a verbal contract with M Ltd trading as NN that the shop would sell 56 items of brand-new clothing on behalf of them. It was agreed they would...
...3 Payment 16 Fee schedule 16 Change of lawyers 16 Disbursements 17 Travel 17 Interpreters/translators 17 Payment arrangements 17 Relationship with Legal Aid 18 Court entry 18 Concurrent legal aid cases 18 Without Notice applications 18 Appendix 1 – Glossary 19 Appendix 2 – Financial Eligibility Thresholds 21 Appendix 3 – Funding Declaration Form Example 22 Appendix 4 – Family Legal Advice Service (FLAS) Stages 26 Appendix 5 – Family Legal Advice...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 685 APPLICANT JL RESPONDENT Company P Limited SECOND RESPONDENT SX The Tribunal orders: 1. SX (trading as Company P) is to pay JL $1,607.50, being the unpaid balance from the total sum of $7,115.00 on or before Wednesday 18 September 2024. 2. The claim against Company P Limited is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In late 2021, JL c...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1327 APPLICANT SG RESPONDENT H Limited The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In 2014, Mr G and a banking colleague, ST, embarked on an enterprise through a start-up company, H Limited (the company), to provide finance to companies secured by their accounts receivables. 2. In the early days...
...a proceeding is a derogation from the principle that the parties have a right to be present throughout the hearing, the open evidence and submissions must contain as much as can be said in support of the withholding ground without compromising the claim that the information was lawfully withheld from the requester. Expressed another way, the closed evidence and submissions must be strictly confined to that which is necessary for the agency to justify the withholding decision under ss 27 a...
...Tribunal for the period commencing 1 July 2020 and ending on 30 June 2021. The Tribunal is a well performing judicial body producing high quality and timely decisions and orders. The financial year saw a small increase in the number of new claims commenced compared with the previous financial year and a relatively large increase in the number of claims finalised. The number of claims filed remains modest, as we are now well past the peak of ‘leaky home’ building in this cou...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 410 APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In March 2023, NN purchased a [electric bike] from C Ltd in [City]. NN says the assurance from sales staff that the bike was also able to charge his phone was a critical factor in his purchase. NN quickly discovered however...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 646 APPLICANT BE RESPONDENT IC The Tribunal orders: IC is to pay BE $2,120.00 on or before 20 December 2023. Reasons 1. BE bought a [vehicle] from IC via Trademe for $3,800.00. It was advertised as being in great condition for its age and having no issues apart from minor scrapes on front and rear bumper. However, the first day that...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 410 APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In March 2023, NN purchased a [electric bike] from C Ltd in [City]. NN says the assurance from sales staff that the bike was also able to charge his phone was a critical factor in his purchase. NN quickly discovered however...