12972 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2017] NZDT 1456 APPLICANT SN RESPONDENT BN Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: BN Limited is to pay the sum of $1804.35 to SN on or before Thursday 20 July 2017. Reasons: 1. In March 2016, Mr N’s old ensuite vanity unit was replaced with a new vanity under his insurance policy with BN Limited. By the end of the year...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 27 APPLICANT BW RESPONDENT NK The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In July 2023, BW agreed to purchase a [Car], from NK through [Website] for $4,700.00. In September 2023, BW contacted NK asking for a refund because the car had significant mechanical problems. 2. BW says the condition of the car has be...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 246 APPLICANT AX and KX RESPONDENT WB The Tribunal orders: 1. WB is to pay to AX and KX the sum of $637.23 on or before 12 May 2023. Reasons 1. AX and KX undertook fence repairs on their boundary with WB. They filed a claim seeking to be compensated for the cost of the repairs, and collection costs. The cla...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 345 APPLICANT UD RESPONDENT XI Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. UD bought a new build home from XI Ltd in September 2009. UD says the shower liner in the ensuite shower has now detached from the wall. He seeks an order that XI Ltd is liable to pay him $6,000.00, which he says is the cost to fix the sh...
...employer regardless of any notion of labelling and limitation of liability” and thirdly, that there was “a compelling argument for lifting the corporate veil.” The strike out determination [5] Counsel for the defendant, Mr Cleary, made application to the Authority to have the claims against Ms Sturgess dismissed on the grounds that there was no employment relationship between her and Ms Gini. In a determination 3 dated 23 February 2011, the Authority dismissed Mr Cleary...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 764 APPLICANT A Ltd RESPONDENT NT & TH The Tribunal orders: NT and TH are to pay $28,983.69 to A Ltd by 30/12/23. Reasons 1. This order should be read with that dated 11/5/23. 2. In brief A Ltd says that it is contractually entitled to be paid the amount of its invoices 879 and 876 and the installation of a power and/or water “meter” nee...
...B Buckett, counsel for plaintiff Judgment: 13 March 2019 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [Application for substituted service] [1] This matter commenced life in the Employment Relations Authority as a claim against an ex-employee for breach of the employment agreement, the statutory duty of good faith, and breach of the implied term of fidelity. The Authority dismissed the plaintiff’s claim finding that there was no employment relationsh...
...DISTRICT A20160005718 UNDER Rule 4.10(3), Maori Land Court Rules 2011 IN THE MATTER OF Ruapehu 2 block and a decision of the Deputy Registrar to refuse an application for filing BETWEEN RONALD PERIGO AND MARIA PERIGO Applicants Hearing: 364 Aotea MB 291-296 dated 13 December 2016 Judgment: 17 March 2017 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE S F REEVES Introduction [1] This decision concerns an application by Ronald Perigo and Maria Perigo pursuant...
...of subrogation”. This means an insurer has the right to pursue a third party that the insurer believes caused the loss to its client (the insured) car. As insurer does this to recover amounts it has paid its client. 3. In this case the amount claimed by N Ltd against SB is $10,299.15. 4. The issues to be decided by the Tribunal are: a. Is SB liable in negligence for the damage to QI’s car? b. Is the amount claimed by N Ltd substantiated? Is SB liable in negligence f...
Gisborne District Council v Aratu Forests Limited IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 190 IN THE MATTER OF an application under s 314 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN GISBORNE DISTRICT COUNCIL (ENV-2024-AKL-131) Applicant AND ARATU FORESTS LIMITED First Respondent AND CASSANDRA ROSE CROWLEY Second Respondent AND MAUI TE KOTUKU TANGOHAU Third Respondent AND MATTHEW DAVIS WAK...