12972 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 713 APPLICANT KO RESPONDENT TC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. KO purchased goods through [online] marketplace from TC. KO arranged a courier pick-up of the goods but says only some of the purchased goods were in the package TC provided to the courier. 2. KO says he is entitled to a refund of $160....
...LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 4 [20 January 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 4 ARC 30/10 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF interlocutory applications BETWEEN ROBERT HAIG Plaintiff AND EDGEWATER DEVELOPERS LIMITED First Defendant AND CARRINGTON FARMS LIMITED Second Defendant AND PH II INCORPORATED Third Defendant Hearing: 10 September 2010 (i...
...(the Act). This amount was reduced by a further 30 per cent under s 124. 1 Tupe v The Board of Trustees of Te Manawa o Tuhoe Trust [2021] NZERA 411 (Member Eleanor Robinson). 2 Although that success was on a more limited basis than he had claimed. [2] Mr Tupe now wishes to challenge that determination on a de novo basis, but he requires a grant of leave from the Court as the challenge was not filed within the statutory timeframe. The application is opposed by the Trus...
...whiiwhii/Haratua 1995 Number 32 April/May 1995 Ngai Tahu Claim Investigation Ends with Release of Report A recentlY released Waitangi Tribunal report brings to a conclusion the Tribunal investigation into the Ngai Tahu claim . . The Ngai Tahu Ancillary Claims Report 1995 confirms findings made in an earlier 1991 Tribunal report that the Crown had breached its Treaty obligations. This had occurred during the period 1844-1864 by the Crown failing to set aside sufficient la...
...5038, Wellington 6140, greg.shaw@tetumupaeroa.co.nz christine.reuhman@tetumupaeroa.co.nz mailto:graeme27@xtra.co.nz mailto:greg.shaw@tetumupaeroa.co.nz mailto:christine.reuhman@tetumupaeroa.co.nz 178 Waiariki MB 25 Introduction [1] The applicants seek an award for the costs incurred in pursuing these proceedings against Te Tumu Paeroa. Although an agreement was reached prior to the Court hearing, the applicants claim that the costs they incurred should be met by the Māori...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 532 APPLICANT DL RESPONDENT ET The Tribunal orders: 1. Both the claim and counterclaim are dismissed. Reasons: 2. DL owns the property on [Address 1] and ET owns [Address 2] which sits below DL’s property. 3. Due to a weather event on 17 July 2021, a retaining wall on the boundary of the two properties partially collapsed. 4....
...statement “was incorrect as distributions of funds agreed to by the parties was the responsibility of [the Practitioner’s firm]”. He continued that the Practitioner did not know that he had engaged the other lawyer prior to when that lawyer requested the transfer of the funds. [13] The Applicant was unable to comment on Rule 10.2 but thought it should be changed if it meant that lawyers could transfer money from one firm to another for a client without reference to the clie...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 113 APPLICANT L Ltd RESPONDENT NO APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: NO is to pay $26,361.95 to J Ltd by 7 February 2024. Reasons 1. On 14 September 2022 LC and NO were involved in a collision on [road]. 2. J Ltd claims LC’s vehicle was a write-off because the repair cost of $34,859.95 exceeds the...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 95 APPLICANT N Limited RESPONDENT NU SECOND RESPONDENT KL THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT B Limited APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Limited The Tribunal orders: KL is to pay $17,285.20 to J Limited by the 10th September 2022. Reasons 1. In the absence of KL, who has...