12972 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 199 APPLICANT BD APPLICANT CD RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. CD is 13 years of age and was represented in the hearing by [redacted], BD. 2. CD became a member of U Ltd and in order to do so, provided an incorrect date of birth so that it appeared he met the U Ltd memb...
...COETZEE v OAMARU MEATS LIMITED [2020] NZEmpC 187 [10 November 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 187 EMPC 326/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application to extend time to challenge a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN VERNON COETZEE Applicant AND OAMARU MEATS LIMITED Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances:...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 104 APPLICANT X Ltd RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. L Ltd is to pay X Ltd $1,380.00 on or before 30 March 2023. Reasons: 1. X Ltd purchased a second-hand tractor from L Ltd for $28,000.00. The tractor was advertised as having 1,216 engine hours. 2. When X Ltd received the tractor, it was disappointed wi...
REVIEW AUTHORITY NEW ZEALAND 2013 NZRA 000005 Applicant AS Respondent Secretary for Justice Date of Decision: 3 September 2013 ________________________________________________________________ DECISION ________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION 1. In a decision dated 6 May 2013, the Secretary for Justice (“the Secretary”) declined approval of the Applicant as a lead provider for the Maori Land Court, Maori...
...Networks Incorporated (Vasona) seeks leave to challenge a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) out of time. 1 [2] The Authority’s determination was issued on 16 June 2016. In that proceeding Mr Rajeev Sunder claimed that he was unjustifiably dismissed by Vasona and he sought reinstatement to his position, or to a position no less advantageous to him as well as financial remedies. The issues identified by the Authority in its determination were:...
...daughter-in-law, MT, was in New Zealand unlawfully. Mr McCarthy was engaged to assist the complainant’s daughter-in-law and there was a discussion as to a s 61 request for her.1 Mr McCarthy took money from the complainant and represented that such an application had been made, but in fact he made no request. [2] A complaint was made to the Immigration Advisers Authority (the Authority). The Registrar of Immigration Advisers (the Registrar) has referred it to the Tribunal allegi...
...Conclusion 15. As MS Ltd has proven it is entitled to be compensated for the total amount of $4,051.35 an order is made for that sum. Referee: K Cowie DTR Date: 11 May 2023 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...
........................................................................................ 6 AODT defence lawyers ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Applications for a criminal legal aid grant ................................................................................................................... 8 Assignment of AODT legal aid grants ..............................................
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 627 APPLICANT KG RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: M Ltd is to pay $300.00 to KG by 20 November 2023. Reasons Did M Ltd fail to provide a moving service it promised? 1. KG contracted M Ltd to carry her household goods from [city] to [town]. She was needing to give vacant possession for the property she was leaving and expe...
...Holden & Anor v Smitheram & Ors – PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 7 File No: TRI 2008-101-000109/ DBH 05331 Court: WHT Adjudicator: R Pitchforth Date of Decision: 1 September 2009 Background In this Procedural Order, the Tribunal deals with applications to remove and join certain parties. In particular the Tribunal looks at the role of suppliers and whether they are responsible for the misapplication of their products. Consolidation of Claims This claim has been consolidated wi...