12990 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 568 Under K Ltd’s claim: APPLICANT K Ltd RESPONDENT UD Under UD’s claim: APPLICANT UD RESPONDENT K Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT KQ SECOND RESPONDENT LQ RESPONSENT’S Insurer X Insurance as a business division of X Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. Under K Ltd’s claim, UD is to pay $1,700.00 to K Lt...
Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 144 APPLICANT person or organisation making the original claim ZY RESPONDENT person or organisation originally claimed against BT OTHER PARTY J Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd Result of application for rehearing: Rehearing Refused The Order of 13 December 2023 stands. Reasons for decision: 1. BT applies for...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 115 APPLICANT SN RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. SN and K Ltd purchased adjoining pieces of land at a new subdivision. SN owns [Property 1], and her house was finished first. SN’s builder advised her that a retaining wall needed to be constructed before a fence could be built...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1648 APPLICANT BD RESPONDENT J Limited SECOND RESPONDENT ES The Tribunal orders: 1. BD is to pay J Limited the sum of $3,753.42 on or before 15 July 2021. 2. BD’s claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 29 June 2020 ES was driving towards Auckland on State Highway 16 in lane 4. He indicated to change lanes,...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 357 APPLICANT QQ FIRST RESPONDENT IK SECOND RESPONDENT YM The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 1 December 2022, QQ bought a 2013 [car] from IK. He says IK misrepresented the vehicle and he claims compensation of $4,999.00. 2. On 8 March, the Tribunal added IK’s wife Y...
...having substantial technical expertise. It is imperative that all aspects of any intended use be analysed and all pertinent information be reviewed concerning the component or system in a current product catalogue. Due to the diversity of possible applications and operating conditions for these components and systems, the user, through its own analysis, testing and evaluation, is solely responsible for making the final selection of the products and systems and ensuring that all safety warn...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 54 APPLICANT MT RESPONDENT UI APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) X Ltd The Tribunal orders: UI is to pay X Ltd the sum of $8,500.20 on or before 7 June 2022. X Ltd is to pay the first $1,000.00 of that sum to MT. Reasons: 1. UI undertook hedge trimming work for MT. MT now claims that UI put the hedg...
...orders: A. BT is added as Second Respondent. B. B Ltd, as the Second Respondent’s insurer, is to pay UQ and XQ $4,704.15 on or before 12 January 2024. Reasons 1. On or about 22 October 2022, a collision between the cars belonging to the Applicants and the Second Respondent occurred. Both parties had insurance, and the Second Respondent was held liable for the damage. The Applicants’ insurance company (C Ltd) took about 12 weeks to arrange a repair, during which time th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 126 APPLICANT EU RESPONDENT BQ The Tribunal orders: BQ is ordered to pay EU the sum of $3,447.50. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 21 July 2023. Reasons: 1) There was no appearance of the respondent and the hearing proceeded in his absence. On 27 February 2023 the applicant bought a vehicle from the responden...
1 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 34 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6540: RACHEL ELIZABETH BINNING AND ANGUS PETER WOOD ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL Introduction [1] Rachel Binning and Angus Wood are the owners of a leaky home situated at 10 Raumati Terrace, Khandallah. The origina...