12990 items matching your search terms
...NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2019] NZEmpC 23 EMPC 250/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out part of the proceedings BETWEEN GEORGINA RACHELLE Plaintiff AND AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: G Rachelle, plaintiff in person P...
...unconditional offer on TZ’s property on 24 October 2021 in a multiple-offer situation and their offer was accepted the same day. Settlement took place on 2 December 2021. 2. During removal of vinyl planks from the garage floor after settlement, the applicants’ builder noticed wide cracks which were subsequently determined by a structural engineer to be the result of compromised structural foundation capacity due to soil settlement. 3. VE and BU claim $22,000.00 being the cost...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1633 APPLICANT JU Ltd RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: U Ltd is to pay JU Ltd the sum of $2,111.79 on or before 20 November 2021. Reasons: 1. JU Ltd owns a rental property, insured with U Ltd. The policy includes accidental and malicious damage by the tenants. In December 2020 the tenants moved out, and JU...
........................................................................................ 6 AODT defence lawyers ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Applications for a criminal legal aid grant ................................................................................................................... 8 Assignment of AODT legal aid grants ..............................................
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 65 APPLICANT BH RESPONDENT JT APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) W Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by BH is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 16 August 2023, BH’s [vehicle] was damaged while it was parked outside [address]. BH’s daughter who was the driver at the time believed the damage was caused by JT...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2015] NZDT 1492 APPLICANT BT & FT FIRST RESPONDENT [Redacted] Council SECOND RESPONDENT [Redacted] Transport THIRD RESPONDENT XQ Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On Tuesday 24 March 2015 at around 8:50 am, FT was driving down [Redacted] Rise,...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 29 APPLICANT QN APPLICANT KI APPLICANT FJ RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal orders: 1. The name of the respondent is amended to KN. 2. KN is to pay to QN the sum of $3,223.99 on or before 21 March 2024. Reasons: 1. FJ was the registered owner of a [vehicle] in September 2023. The car had been paid for by KI. FJ and KI...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 309 APPLICANT BL RESPONDENT SI The Tribunal orders: SI is to pay BL $2,239.00 on or before 26 April 2024. Reasons: 1. BL did some work as a contractor for SI on a farm SI was leasing from her parents. 2. BL now claims $2,239.00 from SI for work done in July 2023. 3. SI denies the claim on the basis that BL did not do any work...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1432 APPLICANT SM RESPONDENT CT The Tribunal orders: CT is to pay SMSM $3,400.00 by Friday 28 August 2020. Reasons 1. SM purchased a vehicle from CT for $3,400.00. According to text messages from CT to SM, CT said he had purchased the vehicle from a friend who left the country. A finance company has a se...
...He now seeks to appeal that decision to the High Court. [5] The essential issue for me is whether the questions now raised ought to be determined by the High Court, given their very late emerging nature, the failure to submit the relevant claims to the Corporation for determination and/or the inability of the questions to change the outcome of this appeal. BACKGROUND [6] There is a long history to Mr Chalecki’s claim for compensation for his farming expenses and losses, a...