12990 items matching your search terms
(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1408 APPLICANT KM and MM FIRST RESPONDENT IO Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT LC Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: IO Ltd is to pay $1000.00 to KM and MM on or before 12 June 2020; and The claim against IO Ltd is dismissed. The issuing of this order has been delayed as a result of the COVID 19 lockdown. Reasons 1. On 19 August 2019, LC Ltd (‘LC
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2018] NZDT 1526 APPLICANTS QN RESPONDENT OR The Tribunal hereby orders: The application by QN and KN and the counterclaim by OR are dismissed. Reasons 1. The applicants, Mr and Mrs N, owned a 2000-acre farm near [location] known as [Farm C]. Mr and Mrs N sold [Farm C] on 1 February 2017. 2. On 7 March 1990, QN and O...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 677 APPLICANT BV RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: U Ltd is to pay BV $24,550.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] BV claims that U Ltd, represented by CS, is obliged to cover him under the insurance policy that he holds with [an insurance provider] for the value of his [Car] that was irreparably damaged in a crash. U Ltd has declined to p...
...COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 25 February 2022 Held at: Dunedin/Ōtepoti Appearances: The appellant represented himself C Light for the respondent Judgment: 10 March 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for mental injury - s 26(1)(c), Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 18 December 2017. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of the Corporation...
Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 512 APPLICANT person or organisation making the original claim H Trustees Ltd RESPONDENT person or organisation originally claimed against PT Result of application for rehearing: Rehearing Refused The Order of 13 January 2021 stands. Reasons for decision: 1. I set out the procedural background of this matter, as it is relevant to my decision...
...O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2022] NZEmpC 1 EMPC 292/2021 IN THE MATTER OF an application for special leave to remove proceedings to the Employment Court AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN GF Applicant AND OO Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Applicant in person H Kynaston, counsel for respondent Judgment: 21 January 2022 COSTS JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 452 APPLICANT GI RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. D Ltd is to pay GI $95.00 on or before 18 July 2024. This is calculated as follows: Refund of deposit to GI $300.00 Refund of overpaid rent to GI $ 95.00 Less compensation for cleaning and carpet replacement $300.00 Balance owed to GI $ 95.00 2. The claim by...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 843 APPLICANT H Ltd RESPONDENT NB The Tribunal orders: NB is to pay H Ltd $7,242.84 by 20 January 2025. Background 1. NB engaged H Ltd to manufacture and install kitchen benchtops at her property in [Suburb]. NB viewed and selected the marble slabs at VH, a wholesaler in [City]. 2. The quoted price for job was $25,652.48. NB pa...
...regulations made under this Act, to— (a) enable the defendant to understand the proceeding; and (b) give evidence if the defendant elects to do so. (2) Communication assistance may be provided to a defendant in a criminal proceeding on the application of the defendant in the proceeding or on the initiative of the Judge. (3) A witness in a civil or criminal proceeding is entitled to communication assistance in accordance with this section and any regulations made under this Act to...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 624 APPLICANT KM RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: Claim Dismissed. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. At close to midnight on 4 March 2024, KM arrived at S Ltd seeking a room for the night. The only room available was a Deluxe Suite for which the nightly rate was $440. However, the night manager offered the room to KM at the ra...