Search Results

1. Raumati - Urenui Pā (2019) 394 Aotea MB 272 (394 AOT 272) [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...Whanganui) Appearances: Johnson Raumati and Jamie Tūta in person Judgment: 25 January 2019 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY Introduction [1] Johnson Raumati has sought an order to amend the gazette notice concerning Urenui Pā. When the application was first before the Native Land Court in 1932, one of the owners, Roimata Wi Tamihana, asked that the land be declared a reservation for the use and occupation of the Ngāti Mutunga tribe.1 Subsequently, when the gazette...

2. C v Accident Compensation Corporation [2020] NZHRRT 3 [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...information of a sensitive nature. [3] On 16 July 2014, Mr C injured his back while ten pin bowling on a work outing. At the time he was employed by [redacted]. His General Practitioner diagnosed him with a lumbar and thoracic sprain and submitted a claim form to ACC. [4] Because the back injury had occurred at a work outing, it was identified as a work claim. [The employer] was an accredited employer pursuant to ss 181 to 189 of the Accident Compensation Act 2001. Aon was contracte...

3. TG & TS v NS & Ors [2023] NZDT 332 (9 August 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 332 APPLICANT TG APPLICANT TS RESPONDENT SECOND RESONDENT THIRD RESPONDENT NS NS Ltd BH APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) Applicant’s insurance company The Tribunal orders: 1. BH and NS Limited are both added as Respondents in the claim. 2. BH and NS Limited are jointly and severa...

4. BS & NS v DL [2023] NZDT 50 (9 February 2023) [pdf, 183 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 50 APPLICANT BS APPLICANT NS RESPONDENT DL The Tribunal orders: 1. DL is to pay BS and NS $2,676.22 on or before 2 March 2023. 2. The claim for NS’ medical expenses is struck out. 3. The claim for the filing fee is dismissed. Reasons 1. At around 8.00am on Sunday 23 February 2022, NS was wal...

5. QE v HN [2024] NZDT 212 (7 March 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 212 APPLICANT QE RESPONDENT HN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] QE claims from HN the sum of $1,985.00 as a contribution to the cost of a fence that QE had built on the boundary between his and HN’s properties. HN denies any liability to pay. [2] QE said that the fence in question had been old and dilapid...

6. KB v MY [2019] NZDT 1390 (29 May 2019) [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...MY is to pay the sum of $11,891.60 (including $700.00 insured loss) directly to J Limited on or before 19 June 2019. (I note that the contents of Mr Y’s counter-claim were heard at today’s hearing even though it does not appear to have been formally lodged – I am not requiring it to be formally lodged because of the liability finding made in this decision) Reasons 1. Ms B and Mr Y were the drivers involved in a collision on N Rd in May 2018. They had both been travelling nort...

7. KD & KX v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 533 (21 September 2023) [pdf, 184 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 533 APPLICANT KD APPLICANT KX RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: Introduction: 1. On the 21st of July 2022, KX and his sister KD were booked to fly from [City 1] to [City 2]. 2. KX and KD missed the flight and had to book a flight with [Airline] the following day. 3. Th...

8. KT v EP [2024] NZDT 600 (30 August 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 600 APPLICANT KT RESPONDENT EP The Tribunal orders: EP is to pay $4,999.95 to KT on or before Monday 30 September 2024. Reasons: 1. KT and EP have friends in common. On 30 June 2022 they were at a mutual friend’s house watching a rugby game and were both drinking. KT decided to catch an Uber back to his home and so left the key of his [va...

9. SB v LQ [2024] NZDT 128 (16 April 2024) [pdf, 203 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 128 APPLICANT SB RESPONDENT LQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 9 December 2023 SB purchased a [motor cross] motorbike after seeing it for sale on Facebook Marketplace. He took it for a test drive and negotiated with LQ, who is 16 years of age, to purchase it for the reduced price of $5,400. 2....

10. KT v EG [2024] NZDT 572 (28 May 2024) [pdf, 179 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 572 APPLICANT KT RESPONDENT EG The Tribunal orders: EG is to pay KT the sum of 158.00 on or before 18 June 2024. Reasons: 1. EG, KT, and his partner were flatmates, they all moved into a property at the end of January 2024. EG was the head tenant and others entered into a flat sharing agreement with her. There was tension between EG a...