Search Results

1. SU & WH v BT [2024] NZDT 79 (26 February 2024) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...cost that it would have cost to repair plus the towing and storage of $13,614.00. 9. TU for WH’s position is that the costs are not reasonable and the vehicle was not assessed in person as he wanted. 10. On balance, I find that the costs claimed are reasonable. I say this for reasons which include: a. I preferred the insurer’s evidence that it is not unusual to rely on digital imagery as part of an insurance assessor’s assessment; b. In the absence of any alternative qu...

2. BS v TT [2019] NZDT 1485 (5 December 2019) [pdf, 171 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1485 APPLICANT BS RESPONDENT TT The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. TT is to pay the sum of $1,714.95 to BS on or before Thursday 19 December 2019. If he does not have BS’s bank account details for the payment, he should send to the Tribunal a cheque naming BS as payee so that the Tribunal can forward the cheque to BS....

3. Te Manutukutuku Issue 15 [pdf, 3.1 MB]

   Te Roopu Whakamana i te Tiriti 0 Waitangi Panui Tekau ma rima Mei 1992 Auckland Crown asset sales - Maori propose cooperative scheme The Crown sale of Sylvia Park, Auckland, land for which there is currently a Treaty of Waitangi claim, has prompted claimant tribes in the area to call on the Waitangi Tribunal to report to Government on the tribes' proposed method of assisting the Crown to dis­ pose of its Auckland assets that are under Treaty claim. The proposal is that iwi a...

4. MC v Q Association [2024] NZDT 317 (24 April 2024) [pdf, 214 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 317 APPLICANT MC RESPONDENT Q Association The Tribunal orders: The claim by MC against Q Association is dismissed. REASONS 1. The Applicant, MC, is a member of the Respondent, Q Association (“the Q Association”) which is an incorporated society. MC is also a qualified fire engineer with permanent fire service experience (now retire...

5. AJ v ZQ LCRO 134 / 2010 (7 February 2011) [pdf, 139 KB]

   LCRO 134/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN Mr AJ of Auckland Applicant AND Ms ZQ of Australia Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] At the beginning of July 2009, the Applicant was instructed by Mr VC to...

6. MI v EG [2023] NZDT 194 (23 June 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 195 APPLICANT And Respondent for Counterclaim MI RESPONDENT And Respondent for Counterclaim EG RESPONDENT INSURER Q Ltd The Tribunal directs: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. MI is to pay Q Ltd $6,444.92 on or before Monday 10 July 2023. Reasons: 1. At around 8am on 22 September 2022, MI was indic...

7. Holmes v Housing New Zealand Corporation [2014] NZHRRT 54 [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...are based on income and household composition. Under IRR, HNZC tenants on low incomes pay no more than 25% of their income in rent. [3] In each year from 2000 to 2006 Mr Holmes applied for and was granted income- related rent. In support of each application he was required to submit (and did submit) an income statement for the previous 52 weeks. These statements were issued by Work and Income of the Ministry of Social Development (MSD), the agency responsible for making social welfare...

8. BI v H Ltd [2023] NZDT 497 (20 September 2023) [pdf, 94 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 497 APPLICANT BI RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. When the train arrives at the [Town] station, the area gets busy with people disembarking, catching buses, and connecting with other sight seeing operations. It was busy in February this year when BI decided to take an ofte...

9. FD v TN & N Ltd [2024] NZDT 30 (25 January 2024) [pdf, 148 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 30 APPLICANT FD RESPONDENT TN SECOND RESPONDENT N Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed against both respondents. Reasons 1. On 6 April 2023, TN was driving, in the course of his work day, a vehicle owned by his employer, N Ltd. On [Road], in [Suburb],...

10. TO Ltd v DD Ltd [2019] NZDT 1462 (11 December 2019) [pdf, 196 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1462 APPLICANT TO Ltd RESPONDENT DD Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. TO Ltd (TO LTD) sells natural sunscreen products. It engaged DD Ltd (DD LTD) to provide packaging for its products. The packaging agreed upon was foil sealed plastic tubes. DD LTD provided a confidential proposal with c...