13020 items matching your search terms
IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-00012/2019 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN N M and M M as trustees of the C M TRUST Applicants AND EARTHQUAKE COMMISSION First Respondent (Claim Withdrawn) AND TOWER INSURANCE LIMITED Second Respondent Date: 29 March 2021 Appearances: On the papers __________________________________________________________________...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 102 APPLICANT SH RESPONDENT NS The Tribunal orders: 1. NS is to pay $4,000.00 to SH on or before 17 September 2022. Reasons: 2. SH won a [online auction website] auction for a van from NS and paid a $4,000.00 deposit the next day as per their verbal agreement. There were delays in SH organising flights to pick up the...
...[2025] NZLCRO 061 Ref: LCRO 130/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN TF Applicant AND SM Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] The applicant, Mr TF, has applied for review of a determination of the [Area] St...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 88 APPLICANT U Ltd RESPONDENT J Ltd The Tribunal orders: J Ltd is to refund U Ltd $17,100 on or before 1 March 2024. Reasons 1. U Ltd admits it contracted to purchase a caravan for $143,0000 from J Ltd on 23 June 2023. U Ltd paid a deposit of $28,600 on 26 June 2023. 2. A number of customisations were requested, and these were...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 77 APPLICANTS FQ & TZ RESPONDENT QM The Tribunal orders: QM is to pay $599.00 to FQ and TZ on or before 8 March 2022. Reasons 1. In April 2020, FQ and TZ booked the services of QM as a photographer for their wedding, which was originally scheduled for November 2021. They paid a 20% deposit of $599.00, $2999....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 588 APPLICANT IB RESPONDENT TT The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In March 2021, IB (the buyer) entered into a sale and purchase agreement to purchase a property at [address], in a private sale from TT (the seller) and his wife. The buyer got a building inspection done before purchase, though not a specialised...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 407 APPLICANT NI RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NI engaged Q Ltd to move his belongings between two houses within [City]. 2. Q Ltd came and moved NI’s belongings and charged him $945.00 for four and half hours work. 3. NI paid Q Ltd, but now seeks $710.00. This is comprised of a...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2012] NZDT 305 BETWEEN AFJ Ltd APPLICANT AND JKB Insurance Ltd APPLICANT’S INSURER AND ZUM RESPONDENT Date of Order: 20 September 2013 Referee: Referee MacPherson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZUM is to pay to JKB Ltd the sum of $6,511.14 by 5pm Friday, 4 October 2013. Facts [1] On 10 July 2012, sheep owned by AFJ Ltd at [ad...
...ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 102 EMPC 273/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to serve a defendant overseas BETWEEN KATYA PFENNIGER Plaintiff AND GORDON BLUME First Defendant AND RONALD BRAUN Second Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appe...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 629 APPLICANT NO RESPONDENT UM The Tribunal orders: UM is to pay $900.00 to NO by no later than 20th December 2023. Reasons: 1. UM engaged NO, who operates a gardening services business trading as “BN”, to undertake gardening work on her property. She sent photos to NO showing the section and the tidying up work that was requ...