13020 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 739 APPLICANT T Ltd RESPONDENT ND The Tribunal orders: ND is to pay T Ltd the sum of $2,586.25 on or before 11 September 2024. Reasons 1. ND decided to sell her house by auction using the services of QX of T Ltd. QX is a director and represented T Ltd at the hearing. Very much at the eleventh hour, ND had a change of heart an...
...Radius Residential Care Ltd (Radius), seeks an order for costs against the first and second defendants and four named third defendants (Janet Franklin, Elizabeth Packer, Polly Bell and Donna Mather). The plaintiff has formally discontinued its claims against the remaining third defendants so that there are now no issues of costs in respect of them. [2] The plaintiff seeks costs from these defendants in the sum of $32,000 and an order for reimbursement of its hearing fees of...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 95 APPLICANT IB RESPONDENT ED The Tribunal orders: ED is to pay $1,172.00 to IB before 21 March 2024. Reasons 1. IB rented a container in ED’s storage yard. Both parties agree that IB left a bucket full of grow-tent poles beside/behind the storage container for an extended period. ED believed the poles to be unwanted and w...
...ORAL JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS Introduction [1] This judgment deals with a collateral proceeding to a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) dated 21 June 2018.1 The judgment deals with an application by the plaintiff ANZ Sky Tours against the defendant Ms Wei for declarations that she is in contempt and imposing substantial fines against her. 1 Wei v ANZ Sky Tours Ltd t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1326 APPLICANT QC Limited (in liquidation) RESPONDENT WD Limited The Tribunal orders: 1. WD Limited is to pay to QC Limited (in liquidation) the sum of $800.00 on or before 30 August 2020. 2. QC Limited (in liquidation) is to provide a credit note or fresh GST invoice to WDL for this sum. Reasons 1. QC Limited...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 490 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT NC The Tribunal orders: NC is to pay the sum of $8,662.08 to B Ltd on or before Friday 21 June 2024. Reasons: 1. B Ltd, an engineering consultancy, seeks payment by NC of two unpaid invoices totalling $9,170.38 plus interest. The invoices are for services provided in July to August 2022 in relation to th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 35 APPLICANT BH RESPONDENT MW Ltd The Tribunal orders: MW Ltd is to pay $1,875.00 to BH on or before 21 April 2023. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. After email exchanges and a visit to the premises, in September 2020, BH and IB booked [Venue] (operated by MW Ltd) for their wedding on 7 January 2023. The contracted pr...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1416 APPLICANT KG RESPONDENT TM APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) LMN Ltd The Tribunal orders: TM is to pay $4380.37 to LMN Ltd on or before 2 September 2020; and the counter-claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. KG and TM were the drivers involved in a minor motor vehicle collision as KG was turning left...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 757 APPLICANT E Ltd RESPONDENT B Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay J Ltd $2,211.19 on or before Thursday 12 December 2024. J Ltd is to pay the first $350.00 of that sum, or a proportionate share of the excess if that is J Ltd’s policy, to E Ltd. Reasons: 1. E Ltd was...
...[7] The claimant and the first, second, fifth and seventh respondents made submissions. SUBSTANTIAL MERIT Limitation [8] The claimant was put on notice that there would be a defence based on limitation in November 2005 when an application was made to Adjudicator Green to strike out the claim filed under the 2002 Act. The application was declined after submissions that a full factual assessment required a hearing. No new material was provided at this hearing. [9...