Search Results

1. Odlin Family Trust v Hurunui District Council [2013] NZWHT Auckland 3 [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...If a claim is settled by agreement between the parties before the tribunal's determination is given, the tribunal— (a) must terminate the adjudication proceedings; and (b) if requested by the parties, may record the settlement in the form of a determination on agreed terms. [15] I do not accept that a claim can be settled by agreement when one party has objected to the terms of that agreement and refused to sign the deed of settlement. The claimants’ acceptance of...

2. [2024] NZIACDT 14 – SC v Murthy (23 April 2024) [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...Registrar: Self-represented Complainant: R Small, counsel Adviser: Self-represented 2 PRELIMINARY [1] The complainant was a failed refugee claimant. He approached the adviser seeking assistance to renew a work visa. She made a work visa application for him. It failed. [2] A complaint against the adviser was made to the Immigration Advisers Authority (the Authority). It has been referred by the Registrar of Immigration Advisers (the Registrar) to the Tribunal. It is...

3. [2012] NZCA 365 CA358/2012 The Secretary for Education v New Zealand Educational Institute [pdf, 35 KB]

   ...the papers) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT A Leave to appeal is granted. B The approved question of law is whether the Secretary for Education is properly named as the sole respondent when the Employment Relations Authority investigates claims of the NZEI for declaratory and compliance orders for alleged breaches by the Secretary of the Primary Teachers’ Collective Agreement. C Costs are reserved. Solicitors: Crown Law Office, Wellington for Applicant Oak...

4. H Ltd v QH [2023] NZDT 771 (14 December 2023) [pdf, 149 KB]

   Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 771 APPLICANT H Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT QH SECOND RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim against QH is struck out. 2. The name of the second respondent is amended. 3. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. H Ltd placed a concrete driveway and paths for U Ltd in late 2021. It says it is owed $4,250.00 for its final invoice. 2....

5. M v U [2019] NZDT 1309 (21 August 2019) [pdf, 216 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1309 APPLICANT Mr M Wairoa RESPONDENT Ms U Wairoa The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Mr M replaced a boundary fence between his property and his neighbor, Ms U. 2. He filed a claim in the Tribunal seeking half the cost of the fence ($282.25) plus the cost of removing a flax ($80.00). 3...

6. QM v QU Ltd [2021] NZDT 1673 (11 October 2021) [pdf, 117 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1673 APPLICANT QM RESPONDENT QU Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. QU Ltd is to pay $1,711.08 to QM on or before 31 October 2021. 2. Ownership of the [phone] reverts to QU Ltd. 3. QM is to return the [phone] to QU Ltd immediately at her cost. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 4. On 2 August 2021, QM (using the name KM)...

7. DT v BQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 22 (15 February 2022) [pdf, 183 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 22 APPLICANT DT RESPONDENT BQ The Tribunal orders: 1. BQ is to pay DT $400.00 on or before 5.00pm on 8 March 2022 Reasons: 1. DT booked one night’s accommodation on [Travel website] at QW; property owned by BQ. The cost of the accommodation was $1,350.00 plus a cleaning fee of $110.00 for one night. DT claims that...

8. DL Ltd v DX [2023] NZDT 647 (6 November 2023) [pdf, 191 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 647 APPLICANT DL Ltd RESPONDENT DX The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. DL Ltd entered into an agreement to build a custom vanity for DX. After the vanity was installed and the plumbing had been completed, including the sink installation, the top vanity draw would not close. DL Ltd took the top draw away, made s...

9. CD Ltd v CO Ltd [2022] NZDT 279 (10 November 2022) [pdf, 101 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 279 APPLICANT CD Ltd RESPONDENT CO Ltd The Tribunal orders: CO Ltd is to pay $9152.91 to CD Ltd on or before 24 November 2022. Reasons 1. In late 2021, over several months, CD Ltd provided trucking services to CO Ltd across 12 construction sites, removing materials including soil, clay, rubbish and rocks and tipping them...

10. HH v NC [2024] NZDT 53 (29 February 2024) [pdf, 93 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 53 APPLICANT HH RESPONDENT NC APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: NC is to pay J Ltd $2,858.19 on or before Wednesday 20 March 2024. Reasons: 1. On 25 January 2023, there was a collision between HH’s [ute] and NC’s campervan on a bridge on the [highway]. The collision occurred when NC tried to move from t...