13020 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 431 APPLICANT FU RESPONDENT KT SECOND RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In January 2021 FU purchased a car from or through G Ltd, the purchase was financed with a loan from [finance company]. After about a week, he discovered oil leaking, and took it to KT, who said...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 56 APPLICANT LI Ltd RESPONDENT TC as Trustee of TC Family Trust The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. LI Ltd carried out preliminary work for TC (as Trustee) for a large home renovation project. She confirmed with LI Ltd in September 2022 that she had decided to engage their services as the builders for her h...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 245 APPLICANT BF RESPONDENT XX The Tribunal orders: XX is to pay the sum of $636.69 to BF on or before Thursday 8 June 2023. Reasons: 1. On 17 February 2022, BF (the head tenant) entered into a flat-sharing agreement with XX (the flatmate). The flatmate paid a bond of $250.00, and two weeks’ rent in advance a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1406 APPLICANT KS RESPONDENT OT Ltd RESPONDENT OT Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. KS rented a storage unit from OT Ltd. On 29 May 2020 the premises were burgled. KS’s unit, and 22 others, were broken into. Some personal items including a watch, shoes and golf clubs were taken from KS...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 89 APPLICANT OS RESPONDENT E Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 2. OS is seeking compensation from E Ltd for failing to deliver goods within a reasonable time. The claim is disputed by E Ltd. 3. The issue for determination by the Tribunal is whether OS is entitled to compensation for th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 57 APPLICANT SD RESPONDENT MT APPLICANT'S INSURER B Ltd The Tribunal orders: MT is to pay the sum of $1,484.75 to B Ltd on or before Monday 11 March 2024. Reasons: 1. On 5 May 2023, there was a collision between SD’s [vehicle] and MT’s car on the roundabout at the intersection between [Road 1] and [Road...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 779 APPLICANT S Ltd RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: U Ltd is to pay the sum of $700.00 to S Ltd on or before 11 December 2023. Reasons: 1. U Ltd (the buyer) opened a credit account with S Ltd (the seller) in 2021, and signed a document that set out the seller’s general conditions of sale. Clause 7 of those conditions ga...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 791 APPLICANT QE RESPONDENT TA APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: TA is to pay J Ltd the sum of $2,229.74 on or before 31 January 2024. Reasons: 1. TA reversed into QE’s parked car. She accepts responsibility for the collision but queries the extent of the damage and the cost of repairs org...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 684 APPLICANT DI RESPONDENT H Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 15 September 2023 DI purchased a [Car] registration [redacted] from H Limited. The vehicle had a new Warrant of Fitness (WOF) expiring 19 March 2024. 2. On 13 December 2023 DI took the [Car] to [a Service Station] for a service. DI says...
...REPRESENTATION: Ms A Hill for plaintiff Mr J Williams for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 19 June 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME1 [1] On 2 May 2023 Mr Keen’s claim against the Department of Corrections (Corrections) was served by post on Corrections. [2] Regulation 15(1) of the Human Rights Review Tribunal Regulations 2002 required the statement of reply to be filed by 9 June 2023, being 22 working...