12993 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 539 APPLICANT DC RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. DC was visiting K Ltd at about 8pm on a Sunday evening with friends. He asked the barman if he, the barman, could plug his phone in to charge, behind the bar. The barman agreed and plugged DC’s phone in. 2. At 8.20pm that night C...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 283 APPLICANT QH Ltd RESPONDENT BD APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: BD is to pay J Ltd $17,402.66 on or before 18 March 2024. Reasons 1. BD crashed into the large cantilever gate at the entrance to the QH Ltd premises. 2. QH Ltd and its insurer, J Ltd, claim $17,402.66 as a contribut...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 267 APPLICANT ND RESPONDENT MI Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. MI Ltd is added as the Respondent to this claim. 2. TN and SE are removed as parties to the proceedings. 3. MI Ltd are ordered to pay ND a sum of $80 by 5pm on 28 May 2024. Reasons: 1. ND files this claim seeking a full refund of $264.99 paid for a [garden kit]...
...14 Proposed Family Legal Support Fee Schedule: 15 4 Introduction The Family Court Reform Bill has been passed into legislation and the new Family Justice System is planned to begin from March 2014. As part of implementing the reforms, the Secretary for Justice intends to establish a new specified legal service to assist eligible people with their care of children and guardianship issues. This service will provide up to four hours of legal support for people who meet t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1349 APPLICANT RK RESPONDENT KS The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. RK purchased a jetski from KS via Facebook marketplace. She did not test run the jetski in the water prior to purchase but took it out on the water with her partner a few days after collection. Once the motor had warmed up, t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1715 APPLICANT KQ RESPONDENT XQ SECOND RESPONDENT AB The Tribunal orders: The claim by KQ against XQ and AB is dismissed. Reasons 1. XQ and AB own a property at [Address suppressed] (“the property”). KQ, who is XQ’s mother, was living with them in that property from September 2019. While KQ was li...
...personal information; and (b) to have access to that information. (2) Where, in accordance with subclause (1)(b), an individual is given access to personal information, the individual shall be advised that, under principle 7, the individual may request the correction of that information. (3) The application of this principle is subject to the provisions of Parts 4 and 5. [5] By email dated 28 May 2009 Mr Te Wini sent to Mr Askelund an attachment in the form of a letter dated 5 Ma...
...circumstances from the time Ms Dablo had taken the risk of continuing to work, and it would be worse if the employers became aware and Ms Dablo had to stop working. She needed to sustain herself financially. Professional advice and direction [85] Ms Tan claims she acted professionally and appropriately throughout. [86] The communications in the electronic messages were as friends. However, Ms Tan appropriately continued to advise Ms Dablo that she needed to find work in her field in...
...AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2024] NZLCDT 44 LCDT 016/24 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 Applicant AND TAE WOK KWON Practitioner CHAIR Ms D Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Hon P Heath KC Ms S Hughes KC Prof D Scott Ms S Stuart HEARING 22 November 2024 HELD AT Specialist Courts and Tribunals Centre...
...professional duties as a licensed immigration adviser. [2] The professional engagement arose when Mr BO needed a variation to his work permit, as he wanted to work for a new employer. [3] He says Mr XTT met with him briefly, and gave him a blank form to sign. Mr XTT failed to tell him that he could not take up work with a new employer until Immigration New Zealand processed the application. Mr XTT delayed filing the application, and did not keep in touch with him. [4] Mr BO took...