Search Results

1. Bristol - Rangipo North 8 (2006) 178 Aotea MB 80 (178 AOT 80) [pdf, 405 KB]

   ...Book 178 AOT 80 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20060005222 UNDER Section 43, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 Hearing: IN THE MATTER OF Rangipo North 8 RANGI BRISTOL MATIU HAITANA AlDEN GILBERT CHRIS NGAITERUA Applicants 23 May 2006, 170 Aotea MB 51-60 Appearances: Mr M McGhie for Tamahaki Ms L Poutu for N gati Rangi Judgment: Mr Te K Williams for Ngati Waewae 29 November 2006 RESERVED DECISION OF JUDGE L R HARVEY ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARIN...

2. BL & CL v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 413 (24 April 2024) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...received by 1pm on 6 February 2024, they would cancel the contract and seek a refund of fees paid to that time. This is what occurred. B Ltd did then provide a link to revised plans on 10 February 2024, although BL and CL say these did not address the requested changes. 2. B Ltd advised by email on the day of the hearing, that it would not be attending. Two telephone calls were made to B Ltd at the time of the hearing and the dispute was also called in the Courthouse. In accordance wit...

3. NQ v OS [2022] NZDT 109 (10 August 2022) [pdf, 91 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 109 APPLICANT NQ RESPONDENT OS The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 2. In February 2022 OS’ garden shed was blown over his fence during a storm. It ended up flying across the road and hitting NQ vehicle, causing damage. NQ is claiming $4,378.20 for repairs to her vehicle. 3. The issues...

4. ET v XS [2020] NZDT 1450 (16 October 2020) [pdf, 99 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1450 APPLICANT ET RESPONDENT XS The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. ET purchased Forex software from XS, who was acting as an agent for BQ, a US-based company, after communication between the two on a Facebook page for [Redacted] investors in New Zealand. ET became interested in forex trading us...

5. AG Ltd v SQ [2018] NZDT 1443 (30 October 2018) [pdf, 105 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2018] NZDT 1443 APPLICANT AG Ltd RESPONDENT SQ The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim by AG Ltd against SQ is dismissed. REASONS 1. On 28 August 2015, SQ and MN lent $500 from AG Ltd. Payments of $15 per week were made initially but were made less frequently in late 2015 and then stopped completely in 2016. AG Ltd se...

6. QH v KH [2020] NZDT 1467 (2 December 2020) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...currently work and it is not known exactly when it stopped working. It is shown working in the marketing photos for the property. In the emails presented, the pool light is noted to be functioning on 12 June, 4 days before settlement. By 3 July QH had informed the real estate agents that it was not working. There is no further evidence as to when it failed. For these reasons I find that it is not proven on the balance of probabilities that the light failed prior to settlement. Therefore,...

7. NX & QT v X Ltd [2023] NZDT 209 (28 April 2023) [pdf, 107 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 209 APPLICANT NX and QT RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons Did X Ltd breach the Fair Trading Act 1986 regarding advertised prices? 1. NX and QT have claimed that X Ltd has breached the Fair Trading Act 1986 (FTA). Their claim is that X Ltd offered prices for travel but fares were...

8. N Ltd v R Ltd & TQ [2024] NZDT 418 (9 May 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 418 APPLICANT N Ltd RESPONDENT R Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT TQ The Tribunal orders: TQ and R Ltd, jointly and severally, are to pay N Ltd $15,000 by 27 May 2024. If that full sum is not paid by the given date, TQ and R Ltd, jointly and severally, are ordered to pay N Ltd $25,126.35 by 28 May 2024. Reasons: 1. It is an undisput...

9. [2018] NZEmpC 98 Ovation NZ Ltd v The NZ Meat Workers and Related Trades Union [pdf, 343 KB]

   ...WELLINGTON [2018] NZEmpC 98 [20 August 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2018] NZEmpC 98 EMPC 196/2018 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed in full from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a verification order BETWEEN OVATION NEW ZEALAND LIMITED First Plaintiff AND TE KUITI MEAT PROCESSORS LIMITED Second Plaintiff AND THE NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS AND RELATED TRADES UNION...

10. Cambie v ACC [2012] NZACA 7 [pdf, 72 KB]

    ...Respondent BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY R Bedford HEARING at Wellington on 15 December 2011 APPEARANCES/COUNSEL Mylinh Dao for appellant Alistair Barnett for respondent INTERIM DECISION [1] This is an application for leave to appeal out of time against a review decision which was delivered in 1993, upholding the Corporation’s decision of 9 March 1993, to decline the appellant’s claim under the Accident Compensation Act 1982 for cover for h...