Search Results

1. Hayward v Barnardos NZ Inc (Jurisdiction) [2022] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...action is unnecessary or inappropriate; or (b) decide to investigate the complaint under subpart 2. (3) As soon as practicable after making a decision under subsection (2), the Commissioner must notify the complainant of the decision. [13] The application of PA, s 98(1)(a) was discussed in Re Jones (Rejection of Statement of Claim) [2021] NZHRRT 19 at [14]: [14] ... Proceedings under s 98(1)(a) are only possible where the Commissioner first decides to use best endeavours to secure a...

2. Hastie and Dredge TRI-2023-100-001 Procedural Order 5 [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...ARCHITECT LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 1496058) Fourth Respondent AND DSF BUILDERS LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 1863635) Fifth Respondent AND CONTRACT HOLDINGS LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 636388) Sixth Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER 5 Removal application by the sixth respondent - declined Dated 22 February 2024 2 Introduction [1] The sixth respondent has applied to be removed from this proceeding under s 112 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006...

3. CV v IT [2023] NZDT 185 (31 July 2023) [pdf, 225 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 185 APPLICANT CV RESPONDENT IT The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. IT and FS contracted CV to erect a kitset [Supplier] cabin on their property in [Suburb]. 2. At that time CV’s details were listed on the “Find a builder or tradesperson” page on [Supplier]’s website. 3. CV ca...

4. KT v BM [2021] NZDT 1571 (22 July 2021) [pdf, 182 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1571 APPLICANT KT RESPONDENT BM The Tribunal orders: BM is to pay KT $350.00 by 5 August 2021. Reasons: 1. KT seeks repayment of a bond of $350.00 from BM. 2. Both parties attended the hearing. Background 3. On 12 August 2020 KT signed a flatmate agreement with BM. The agreement was to start on 24 August. Weekly...

5. T Ltd v C Ltd & CD [2023] NZDT 298 (10 August 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 298 APPLICANT T Ltd RESPONDENT C Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT CD APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) GN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 20 May 2022, temporary metal scaffolding erected to cover a second story roof top sw...

6. UW v X Ltd [2022] NZDT 290 (12 December 2022) [pdf, 185 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 290 APPLICANT UW RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons Did X Ltd fail to provide UW with a licence he was entitled to receive? 1. UW has claimed that by withholding the PG 2 (paragliding) license he was entitled to receive, X Ltd breached his contractual rights...

7. XL v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 466 (7 June 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 466 APPLICANT XL RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. XL hired a truck from D Ltd trading as IJ in December 2023, selecting the ‘Q’ insurance option. When he returned the truck after the hire, the IJ staff member pointed out damage high on the side panel of the truck near the roof, and advise...

8. WQ Ltd v X Ltd & CG ta UQ [2021] NZDT 1429 (3 May 2021) [pdf, 218 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1429 APPLICANT WQ Limited FIRST RESPONDENT X Limited SECOND RESPONDENT CG trading as UQ The Tribunal orders: CG and X Limited are jointly and severally liable to pay $828.00 to WQ Limited by 25 May 2021. Reason Was the vehicle of acceptable quality? 1. The claim made by WQ Limited (WQ)...

9. Te Manutukutuku Issue 21 [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   Te Roopu Whakamana i te Tiriti 0 Waitangi Panui Rua tekau rna tahi Paengawhawha 1993 Waitangi Tribunal Division Department of Justice Newsletter ISSN 0114-717X Number 21 April 1993 Waitangi Tribunal Reports on Pouakani Claim The Waitangi Tribunal has recommended that 370-acres of Crown owned forest land in the central North Island be returned to Maori in settlement of .the Pouakani claim. The lands had originally been taken in part pay­ ment of costs associated with land sur...

10. Williams v Cotter-Arlidge - Okaihau 3C2 (2019) 77 Tākitimu MB 51 (77 TKT 51) [pdf, 416 KB]

    ...returns had been received since 2003 and IRD were considering prosecution. No other person was engaged for accounting work by the trust. To obtain financial records, Mr Williams contacted advisory trustee Aoterangi Cotter, who both provided the information and signed Mr Williams’ engagement form. The applicant submits this form was signed on 27 April 2012. Mr Williams states he was also approached by the Māori Land Court regarding a review of the trust at a similar time. [9] F...