12987 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 112 APPLICANT in claim, Respondent in counterclaim BT RESPONDENT in claim, Applicant in counterclaim US The Tribunal orders: 1. US is to pay $1,500.00 to BT before 11 June 2023. 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BT engaged US to provide food platters, some drinks, and bar services at an agreed price of $2...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 265 APPLICANT CK and QK RESPONDENT XL The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 21 December 2022, QK was driving North on [highway] between [village 1] and [village 2] when she lost control of the vehicle and crashed into the bushes on the side of the road, causing damage to her vehicle. The accident occurred on...
...after the work was done. He complained about them some months later when a dispute arose about payment. 11. I have therefore also dismissed XX’s counterclaim. Referee: T Prowse Date: 17 May 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...
...OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2025] NZEmpC 88 EMPC 295/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs on interlocutory matter BETWEEN CUSHLA HURRELL Plaintiff AND MENOPAWS LIMTED T/A NUMBER 8 CAFÉ Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: E Brankin, advocate for plaintiff...
...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 608 APPLICANT TM APPLICANT YM RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. K Ltd are to pay $15,000.00 to TM and YM. Reasons 1. The applicants purchased a kitchen from the respondent pursuant to a contract dated 17th January 2023. The kitchen was installed in April 2023. 2. The applicants claim that the respondent described the kitchen as being as solid wood but that they...
...Co-ordination (NASC) organisation, which decides whether the client is eligible for Carer Support, whether Carer Support is an appropriate support option for the client and full-time carer, and the extent of the client’s eligibility. The NASC informs the client and full time carer about their carer support allocation and how the system works. They also inform the Ministry how many days per year it has allocated to a full-time carer for support. Once the Ministry receives notifi...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 86 APPLICANT L Ltd RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. L Ltd runs a grocery shop as a member of the TW franchise group. B Ltd provides merchant card services to L Ltd, which allows L Ltd’s customers to pay for goods with credit cards and so forth. L Ltd runs a “click and collect” onlin...
(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1318 APPLICANT JC and QN As Trustees of the JCT Trust RESPONDENT GCQ Incorporated The Tribunal orders: 1. GCQ Incorporated is to pay JC and QN (as trustees of the JCT Trust) $2,129.43 by Wednesday 16 December 2020. Reasons 2. The claim relates to what is a fair reduction for rent during the Level 4 lockdown. 3. The JCT Trust (Trust)
BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD v DEBORAH CLIFF NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 163 [18 September 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 163 EMPC 179/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file a cross- challenge out of time BETWEEN BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Applicant AND DEBORAH CLIFF Respondent Hearing: On the papers received on 25 August and 15 September 2015 Appearances: M Be...
...August 2022 however, the goods become the property of SC and II, and they may dispose of them as they see fit. C. If any problems arise about the removal of the goods that the parties cannot resolve themselves, this can be raised by way of an application for a rehearing by either party limited to this issue. Reasons 1. II and SC wanted to build an extension on their house in about September 2021. A friend introduced them to FX, a builder. FX gave them a draft contract which S...