12987 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 778 APPLICANT KU RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. N Ltd is to pay the sum of $17,975.06 to KU on or before Monday 25 September 2023. 2. Once payment has been made, KU is to return the vehicle to N Ltd. Reasons: 1. On 16 December 2022, KU (the consumer) purchased a [car] from N Ltd, trading as IT (the supplier),...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 167 APPLICANT CT RESPONDENT DF Ltd t/a ID The Tribunal orders: DF Ltd t/a ID is to pay to CT $1,042.34 on or before 5:00pm on Friday 17 May 2024. Reasons 1. On 17 August 2021, CT bought a Hybrid battery from DF Ltd t/a ID for $2,651.20. The battery came with a 2 year/60,000km warranty. On or around 22 January 2023, CT reporte...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 691 APPLICANT BG RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal orders: The claim by BG is dismissed. Reasons 1. The hearing was held at 2pm on 4 November 2024. BG left the hearing at 3.13pm because she had not taken time off work for the hearing. In accordance with section 42(1) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988, the hearing continued in her absenc...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 696 APPLICANT TN RESPONDENT KM The Tribunal orders: KM is to pay TN the sum of $1,597.50 on or before 15 January 2025. Reasons 1. The parties were friends. KM lived as a boarder in TN’s house for a period of a couple of years (the exact length of time is in dispute). KM was required to move out of the house after signifi...
...Cadastral Survey Act 2002. The Disputes Tribunal has no jurisdiction under that Act. Outcome 23. The claim and counter-claim are dismissed. Referee: Nicholas Blake Date: 16 August 2023 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...
Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 479 APPLICANT TU FIRST RESPONDENT SECOND RESPONDENT EN C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim against EN in relation to the retaining wall is dismissed. (The claim in relation to the ensuite has been settled via payment by C Ltd of $5703.53 on 14 May 2024). Reasons 1. TU engaged NI Ltd trading as NQ (removed from the Companies...
...[2023] NZLCRO 154 Ref: LCRO 121/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN AI Applicant AND HR Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] The applicant has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committe...
...proceedings to recover the money claimed. [4] On 16 February 2016, the claimant informed (via email) Mr VR’s company of the availability of “advert features” at the cost of “$800+ GST”, plus “$270 outstanding”. 2 The claimant requested payment “in advance” if Mr VR’s company “wish[ed] to proceed” with the printing. A week later the claimant forwarded (via email) a “booking form” to Mr VR’s company “to sign and email … back” with a reminder...
...Auckland. Adviser: Mr S Laurent, Laurent Law, Lawyers, Auckland. Date Issued: 26 February 2014 2 DECISION Preliminary [1] The Registrar received a complaint relating to the adviser concerning her handling of a Refugee Status claim. [2] The complainant says: [2.1] The adviser advised the complainant regarding her immigration options. [2.2] The advice she gave was to apply for refugee status and there was no discussion of other options. [2.3] The refu...
......................... 10 Should I terminate the claim pursuant to section 109? ............................................ 13 Abuse of process .................................................................................................... 13 Application for transfer to the High Court ................................................................. 14 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 15 P...