12987 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 92 APPLICANT TN RESPONDENT QS The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. TN was riding her scooter to work and approached a busy intersection. She was in the cycle lane and was intending to pass straight through the intersection when she saw a vehicle being driven by QS, make a right turn in front o...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1366 APPLICANT BI RESPONDENT SQ Incorporated APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) T Insurance Limited The Tribunal orders: SQ Incorporated is to pay $100.00 to BI on or before 17 December 2020. Reasons 1. In June 2020 a golf ball smashed the front windscreen of BI’s car - she lives adjac...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 304 APPLICANT DQ RESPONDENT OL APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: OL is to pay $4560.69 (being all insured loss) to J Ltd on or before 31 May 2024. Reasons 1. The claim is proven that OL negligently caused damage to DQ’s vehicle when she entered a roundabout and crossed the path of DQ’s v...
(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 285 APPLICANT DQ RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by DQ against H Ltd is proved. 1. H Ltd is to pay DQ the sum of $8500.00 on or by 5:00 pm on 01 August 2023. 2. DQ is to make the car available for collection by H Ltd on or before 5:00pm on 03 August 2023. Reasons 1. DQ the applicant purchased (the car) from the respondent on 01...
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2025] NZLCRO 021 Ref: LCRO 13/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN DG Applicant AND PS Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr DG has applied...
...OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2023] NZEmpC 87 EMPC 364/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to strike out the proceeding BETWEEN IAN RIDDLER Plaintiff AND MERIDIAN ENERGY LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 28 April 2023 (Heard at Christchurch via Audio Visual Link) Appearances: M Hubbl...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 432 APPLICANT XD RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. XD purchased a new G Ltd campervan in [Overseas Country] from [Caravan Company] and imported it into New Zealand. Prior to importing the campervan, XD asked G Ltd [Overseas Country] about the warranty that came with the...
...be determined are: a. Who is the correct respondent? b. Whether the tub is of acceptable quality/fit for purpose. c. What remedy is available to HM. 3. An applicant (in this case HM) in the Tribunal must establish the elements of his claim to the required standard to be successful. That standard is the balance of probabilities (based on the evidence before the Tribunal) which means what is more likely than not. Who is the correct respondent? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1651 APPLICANT FI RESPONDENT CI The Tribunal orders: CI is to pay FI $4,110.90 by 4pm on 29 November 2021. Reasons: 1. In August 2020, FI was walking her dog Freddie when there was an altercation with CI’s dog Chase. FI claims that as a result of Chase attacking Freddie, Freddie has required two surgeries...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 380 APPLICANT LQ RESPONDENT NE The Tribunal orders: NE is ordered to pay LQ the sum of $3,200.00. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 19 July 2023. Reasons: 1) In December 2022 the applicant enrolled her dog in a training programme offered by the respondent to dog ow...