12987 items matching your search terms
IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-0039-2020 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN C W Applicant AND EARTHQUAKE COMMISSION Respondent Date: 18 March 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF C P SOMERVILLE [JURISDICTION] ____________________________________________________________...
...REPRESENTATION: Mr C J Tennet for plaintiff Mr D P Neild and Ms V N Rea for defendants DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 18 September 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 [1] Ms Morunga filed her statement of claim in the Tribunal on 19 March 2020. Ms Morunga alleges that the Department of Corrections (Corrections) interfered with her privacy by not responding to her request for personal information within the required timeframe under the Privacy...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 616 APPLICANT BO RESPONDENT NI The Tribunal orders: NI is ordered to pay BO the sum of $1,999.00. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 20 December 2023. Reasons: 1) In December 2022, BO bought an e-scooter from NI. The price paid was $1,999.00. About six months after the purchase, the scooter stopped working. BO has requested a refun...
...Regulations 2002 provides that a defendant who intends to defend proceedings must, within 30 days after the day on which the notice of proceedings is served on him or her, file in the office of the Tribunal a statement of reply to the plaintiff’s claim and must serve a copy of the statement of reply on the plaintiff and any other party. [2] By memorandum dated 19 April 2017 the Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections has sought an extension of time for filing his statement of...
...Regulations 2002 provides that a defendant who intends to defend proceedings must, within 30 days after the day on which the notice of proceedings is served on him or her, file in the office of the Tribunal a statement of reply to the plaintiff’s claim and must serve a copy of the statement of reply on the plaintiff and any other party. [2] By memorandum dated 12 April 2017 the Ministry of Social Development has sought an extension of time for filing its statement of reply until 12 Ma...
...Reuvecamp for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 5 September 2018 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE STATEMENT OF REPLY OUT OF TIME1 Background [1] Upon the filing of the statement of claim on 23 July 2018 the Secretariat on 24 July 2018 sent to IDEA Services Ltd (IDEA Services) a copy of the statement of claim 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (Exten...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1364 APPLICANT N Limited RESPONDENT TC APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) R Insurance Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: TC is to pay the sum of $9550.10 directly to R Insurance Limited on or before 16 October 2019. Reasons 1. Mr X, driving a N Ltd vehicle, and Ms C were the drivers inv...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 268 APPLICANT AZ RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In May 2021 AZ engaged S Ltd as her property manager, for her house in [suburb], while she was [overseas]. The property was tenanted until 4 July 2022. After the tenants moved out S Ltd and AZ’s friend carried out a final inspect...
(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 695 APPLICANT V Ltd RESPONDENT BS The Tribunal orders: BS is to pay V Ltd the amount of $26,318.75 on or before 23 January 2024. Reason 1. The dispute concerns insurance commissions and whether V Ltd can ‘clawback’ commissions from BS. BS was engaged as an independent contractor for V Ltd providing personal insurance to clients. Upon making a sale the insurer would p
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 462 APPLICANT SX RESPONDENT A Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. SX had a new house built by [Company 1] trading as “HI” in 2004/2005. [Company 1] was removed from the Companies Register in 2011 and [Company 2] had been trading as HI for some time. 2. A Ltd, which ha...