12987 items matching your search terms
...v EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY [2022] NZEmpC 191 [25 October 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 191 EMPC 172/2022 IN THE MATTER OF an application for judicial review AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN JOHN McDERMOTT Applicant AND EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY First Respondent AND EMPLOYSURE LIMITED Second Resp...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 234 APPLICANT NX RESPONDENT T Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd and S Ltd are to pay NX $120.00 by Friday 29 March 2024. Reasons: 1. NX, along with his wife, XX as his support person, HF representing T Ltd, and TJ representing S Ltd, all attended the hearing by teleconference. 2. NX bought a kit...
...November after a telephone call from Ms LP, and again by Ms NQ on 24 November. [15] On 24 November the mortgagee’s solicitor replied: “Our client was not obliged to assign the EQC claim to your client. Therefore they have declined your client’s request to have the EQC claim assigned.”4 [16] A file note by Ms NQ indicates that she discussed this with Mr MT on 28 November. Mr MT agreed that the mortgagee’s solicitor was correct and that Ms LP should take a pragmatic appro...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 61 APPLICANT DN RESPONDENT DD Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) QJ Ltd Attn: KB RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) RJ Ltd Attn: MN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 9 February 2021 DN had engaged ND to construct a glass balustrade on the deck of his [V...
...was unable to make a finding that any assurances had been made of a refund that were breached. Mr X presented a case from 2018 in which PM was fined for failing to properly advise its customers of their CGA rights. This case was regarding other claims, and resulted from a prosecution under the Fair Trading Act 1986 (FTA) that would be outside the Disputes Tribunal’s jurisdiction to pursue. I was not able to infer from these breaches that PM could be liable in this case. 27. Howeve...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1646 APPLICANT SA RESPONDENT TD SECOND RESPONDENT I Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. TD and I Ltd are to pay SA $3,075.96 on or before 29 October 2021. Reasons: 1. On 24 August 2020 SA was driving his car on [Road A] in [Suburb B] when he was involved in a collision with a vehicle driven by TD. SA seeks an ord...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 118 APPLICANT CL RESPONDENT HG The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. CL said her and HG were in a relationship for six and a half years, until this dispute arose. CL had arranged to attend a concert with some friends and HG agreed to take her to the airport, stay at her house while she was away and look...
Claim No: 1240 Under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 In the matter of an adjudication claim Between Auckland City Council (as assignee) Claimant And Mark Brian Russell Respondent Partial Determination 21 September 2005 1. Index Para No Heading Page 1. Index 1 2. Summary of Determination 1 3. Adjudication Claim 2 4. The Hearing 4 5. The Present Claim 5 6. Leaks, Damage and Repairs 6 7. General Damages 7 8. Present Cla...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 759 APPLICANT UC FIRST RESPONDENT SECOND RESPONDENT OI – Trustee NI – Trustee THIRD RESPONDENT I Ltd – Trustee The Tribunal orders: The OI Management Trust’s Trustees, OI, NI and/or I Ltd, jointly or severally, shall pay UC $1,255.79 by 11 December 2023. Reasons: 1. UC entered into a commercial lease wi...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...