12987 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 587 APPLICANT IE RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. IE has claimed that X Ltd failed to provide satisfactory advice to him about an Enduring Power of Attorney for his father (NE). In 2019, IE was ordered by the Family Court to refund approximately $137,000.00 of his father’s money to his father...
...1950, s 4(1)(a). 23 Building Act 2004, s 393(2). 24 Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006, s 37. 25 Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006, ss 55(1) & 56(2). The “transition date” is 1 April 2007, so s 55(1) is not applicable. 14 original claim may have been administratively closed, it was not statutorily terminated in accordance with the Act. [69] It follows that the original claim by Mr Engelbrecht in December 2002 remained alive under th...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2011] NZDT 168 BETWEEN ADI APPLICANT AND ZWR Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 8 April 2011 Referee: Referee Davidson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Applicant’s claim is dismissed. Pursuant to s 11(2)(b) of the Disputes Tribunals Act 1988 the Applicant, ADI, must pay the Respondent, ZWR Ltd, $93.33 (incl GST) within 7 days of the date of this order. Facts...
...dated 21 December 2018 (first memorandum), the memorandum of counsel for the applicants in reply dated 29 January 2019 and the memorandum for the respondents' in response dated 7 February 2019 (respondent's response memorandum). Amount of claim [6] The respondents have incurred total solicitor/client and witness costs and disbursements in respect of the proceedings of $65,385.38. Of that, $63,156.59 (including G8T) are solicitor/client costs and disbursements and $2,228.76...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 763 APPLICANT SN RESPONDENT EH The Tribunal orders: The claim by SN against EH is dismissed. REASONS 1. On 15 June 2021, the Applicant, SN, purchased two twin-hulled [Boat]s from the Respondent, EH, for a total purchase price of $14,000.00. 2. The purchase was recorded in a handwritten sale agreement signed by both parties on...
LCRO 178/2011 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Wellington Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN GF of [North Island] Applicant AND UH of [North Island] Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] UH (the Practitioner) acted for GF (the Applicant) in relati...
BRONWYN JOY CLEARKIN v GENEVA HEALTHCARE LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2019] NZEmpC 2 [23 January 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2019] NZEmpC 2 EMPC 2/2019 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge BETWEEN BRONWYN JOY CLEARKIN Applicant AND GENEVA HEALTHCARE LIMITED Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: B Clearkin, applicant in person M Manik, agent for respondent Jud...
...for introduction. 3 Cabinet agreed to establish the Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal (the Tribunal) to provide an alternative pathway for policyholders, insured persons, the Earthquake Commission (EQC) and insurers to resolve insurance claims, in respect of residential land or property, relating to the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes [SWC-18-MIN-009 and CAB-18-MIN-0065]. 4 The Tribunal is one of the Government’s initiatives aimed at helping speed up the resolution of o...
...for introduction. 3 Cabinet agreed to establish the Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal (the Tribunal) to provide an alternative pathway for policyholders, insured persons, the Earthquake Commission (EQC) and insurers to resolve insurance claims, in respect of residential land or property, relating to the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes [SWC-18-MIN-009 and CAB-18-MIN-0065]. 4 The Tribunal is one of the Government’s initiatives aimed at helping speed up the resolution of o...
...v BCM NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 234 [23 December 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 234 EMPC 2/2015 IN THE MATTER OF of an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN AFT Applicant AND BCM Respondent Hearing: By memoranda of submissions and affidavits filed on 21 April, 25 May, 25 June, 14 and 20 July, 18 and 31 August, 14 September, 12 October and 3 November 2015 Appearances: Appl...