12987 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1601 APPLICANT QC RESPONDENT DH Limited SECOND RESPONDENT DN THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT MS The Tribunal orders: 1. DH Limited is to provide QC with the bank account details required for the payment of the amount payable under this order, by post, on or before 5pm on 9 July 2021. 2. On...
...had ended. Ms Linley would have known that Mrs Clough already knew about the offer for the property, having been party to the agency agreement when the offer was made. Ms Linley would therefore have known that the letter was not needed to inform Mrs Clough of the offer, as she already knew about it. The purpose of the letter requested by Mrs Clough could only have been to disclose information about the offer to a third party. [57] The letter provided to Mrs Clough was not addre...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court - [2022] NZDT 111 APPLICANT IU RESPONDENT KI SECOND RESPONDENT CI The Tribunal orders: KI and CI are to pay $3,300.00 to IU on or before 5 September 2022. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. On or about September 2021, IU was driving her car along Street A and B on a day when there was high wind. As she drove past a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 599 APPLICANT UM RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. UM, the applicant, and MI, representing the respondent, F Ltd(“F LTD”) both attended the hearing by teleconference. 2. UM built a new house and had a double-sided gas fire from F LTD installed in it around July 2022. About a month later, the...
...YOUNG GOO KANG v KYOUNG YONG LEE [2020] NZEmpC 37 [27 March 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 37 EMPC 103/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for freezing and ancillary orders BETWEEN YOUNG GOO KANG Applicant AND KYOUNG YONG LEE Respondent Hearing: 26 March 2020 (by telephone conference and subsequent submissions) Appearances:...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 156 APPLICANT BC RESPONDENT Z Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BC purchased a residential home from Z Ltd. BC states that she purchased the property when it was part-constructed and that when she subsequently settled on the property, the home had 50% less storage as a cupboard that was initially on the p...
...AND LM Second Respondent COMPOSITE PARTIAL DECISION (LEGAL AID ISSUES) The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] This is a composite decision on one collective aspect of two applications for review made by the applicant, Mr FK, of two separate decisions made by the [Area] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee), both dated 15 August 2023, on complaints about the alleged conduct of the first respondent, Mr QT, and the...
...plaintiff’s answer and still has not done so. The only document the Court received was a memorandum from Mr Thompson dated 12 November 2012 advising that he was no longer instructed by the plaintiff. [4] On 29 November 2012, the defendant filed an application to strike out the proceedings on the grounds that the plaintiff had failed to comply with my directions. A copy of that application and an affidavit in support of it were served on the plaintiff personally on 15 December 20...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 192 APPLICANT I Ltd RESPONDENT XN The Tribunal orders: XN is to pay I Ltd $30,000.00 on or before Friday 5 May 2023. Reasons: 1. On 30 July 2020, XN purchased a [redacted] vehicle from I Ltd for $34,100.00. The vehicle was purchased on finance and as part of the sale XN used the services of I Ltd to broker insur...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 506 APPLICANT J Ltd RESPONDENT UX The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. J Ltd provide training services and courses in psychological first aid. It contacted UX, [redacted], and offered its service to develop a psychological first aid course to meet the needs of UX. 2. The parties agreed that HS, director of J Ltd, should t...