12972 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1412 APPLICANT BF RESPONDENT BN The Tribunal orders: BN is to pay BF $1,000.00 on or before 22 April 2021. Reasons: 1. BF purchased a [vehicle] from BN in a private sale on 20 September 2020 and drove it home to [Town 1] from [Town 2] that day. He purchased the vehicle as he wished to use it to tow a food caravan....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 624 APPLICANT TD Limited RESPONDENT SC Limited The Tribunal orders, on the claim and counter-claim: SC Ltd is to pay $9557.92 to TD Ltd on or before 19 December 2023. Reasons 1. SC Ltd contracted TD Ltd to build a 50sqm deck at a coastal property where SC Ltd was doing extensive renovation work for the homeowners. SC Ltd had...
...111 [25 September 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 111 EMPC 14/2018 EMPC 47/2018 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN PAUL HINES Plaintiff AND EASTLAND PORT LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: P McBride, counsel for plaintiff E J Brown, counsel for defendant Judgmen...
...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 579 APPLICANT KT and PD RESPONDENT KI The Tribunal orders: KI is to pay KT and PD $542.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] KI engaged KT and PD, the applicants, by way of [job agency] to assist him in moving furniture when he was moving from one property to another. They claim $542.00, which comprises the cost of their labour and some expenses incurred in doing the work. KI accepts that the wo...
...175 [20 April 2012] IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRĀWHITI DISTRICT 2012 Māori Appellate Court MB 175 (2012 APPEAL 175) A20110005401 UNDER Section 98, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an application for an award of costs from the Māori Land Court Special Aid Fund following a withdrawal of an application to appeal BETWEEN TE OHOMAURI RIPIA Applicant Appearances: B Tupara, counsel for the applicant Jud...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 401 APPLICANT EI RESPONDENT TB SECOND RESPONDENT QJ Limited APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: TB is to pay $2,563.74 to B Ltd by 5.00pm on 31 March 2020. TB’s counter claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] EI was in the process of exiting a side road an...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1699 APPLICANT EI RESPONDENT TB SECOND RESPONDENT QJ Limited APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: TB is to pay $2,563.74 to B Ltd by 5.00pm on 31 March 2020. TB’s counter claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] EI was in the process of exiting a side road a...
...short of another collision in front of him. TN was driving [car 2] and AM, an employee of PD Ltd was driving [car 3]. The second and third cars collided with the third car shunting the second car into the first car. 2. TG and its insurer BJ Ltd claimed $2,975.95 for insured losses for his car which was written off, from TN, PD Ltd and AM. However at the hearing, the claim against TN was withdrawn. 3. TN and its insurer BJ Ltd counter claimed $25,597.26 comprising $25,084.48 for r...
...Bruce Stewart QC has appeared with Mr Nicholson this morning for the plaintiff, Mr Stewart being recently brought into the matter. He, having considered the proceedings, has indicated that the plaintiff wishes to file a third amended statement of claim. [2] This third amended statement of claim, which has been handed up in a draft or proposed draft form this morning, effectively discontinues the proceedings against the second defendant, Jacob Roest and the third defendant...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 628 BETWEEN AJ APPLICANT AND ZQ Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 18 July 2014 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is hereby dismissed. Facts [1] Following a routine eye examination in January 2008, AJ (the applicant) was referred to an eye specialist to be tested for suspected ocular hypertension. The testing at the eye specialist...