12972 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 136 APPLICANT LN RESPONDENT K Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT EU APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. LN and a K Ltd truck being driven by EU were involved in a collision at about 8.30am on 7 June 2022 on [Road]. LN alleges she was driving on a straight...
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2021] NZLCRO 010 Ref: LCRO 109/2020 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [AREA] Standards Committee BETWEEN SV Applicant AND FT Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mr SV has app...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 411 APPLICANT CW APPLICANT NK RESPONDENT TX The Tribunal orders: TX is to pay CW and NK $573.30 on or before Friday 28 July 2023. Reasons: 1. In July 2022, CW and NK completed settlement of their purchase of property at [Address] from TX. On taking possession of the property, CW and NK received a key and a r...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 504 APPLICANT TU RESPONDENT I Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT NT The Tribunal orders: 1. NT was joined as a respondent to these proceedings with the consent of all parties. 2. I Ltd is to pay $500.00 to TU on or before 12 July 2024. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 3. On or about 23 April 2024, TU purchased a 6 month old [brand] coffee...
...appropriate to order a nominal amount in compensation of $200 due to the failure of the product to be fit for the purpose. 13. It is noted S Ltd waived the account for the mix due to the difficulties incurred. This is a further benefit to the applicants. 14. The claim also includes the cost of obtaining a report from [laboratory] of $541.77. I find this to be a loss directly resulting from the failure of the product to be fit for the purpose. I accordingly find S Ltd liable to p...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 47 APPLICANT OE RESPONDENT UC The Tribunal orders: UC is to pay $1,640.00 to OE before 8 March 2023. Reasons 1. OE and UC had an agreement that if he paid her $1,700.00 she would return a motorbike which he had previously sold to her. OE claims that UC has breached this agreement as she hasn’t returned th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 563 APPLICANT E Ltd RESPONDENT XL The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. XL contracted E Ltd to construct a timber retaining wall, widen a driveway on a sharp corner, lay a concrete slab for a new garage and install coir matting over loose sand at his property in [Town]. E Ltd quoted $27,462 (“the quote”) fo...
FILE NO: 0092 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN: DAVID JOHN WIDDOWSON & ANGELA PHYLLIS WIDDOWSON Claimant AND: PETER FRANCES BEKX First Respondent AND: DEBBIE ANNE BEKX Second Respondent AND: WAIPA DISTRICT COUNCIL Third Respondent AND IAN M STUART Fourth Respondent (REMOVED) AND STUDORP LTD Fifth Respondent DETERMINATION OF ADJUDICATORS
...gastroscopy. [12] The General Practitioner notes from Dee Street Medical Centre Limited recorded consultations of Ms Brunton on 21 August 2020, 9 October 2020, 14 and 22 December 2020 and 26 January 2021. 5 [13] The original accident compensation claim form was completed and submitted to the Corporation on Ms Brunton’s behalf on 23 December 2020 by Dr John Aiken. Cover was sought for “complications/medical surgical care”, in the context of an “unusual reaction followi...
...plaintiffs P Wicks QC, counsel for defendant Judgment: 17 August 2015 ORAL INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 3) OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1] The plaintiffs have applied for leave to file and serve a second amended statement of claim in circumstances where the proceeding has been set down for hearing and is scheduled to commence a little less than two months hence. The defendant opposes the application for leave. [2] The proceeding was filed urgently on 9 June 2015....