12972 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 198 APPLICANT FB RESPONDENT EE RESPONDENT YT The Tribunal orders: EE is to pay $916.36 to FB on or before Monday 22 May 2023. Reasons: 1. FB purchased a property from EE and took possession on 5 November 2021. After possession she discovered that all the elements on the ceramic stovetop could only operate on ful...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 123 APPLICANT CF RESPONDENT XQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: XQ Ltd is to pay the sum of $1,239.65 to CF on or before Friday 31 March 2023. Reasons: 1. On 14 September 2022, CF purchased a [computer] via [online platform] and paid $1,220.00 by bank transfer to an account in the name of XQ Ltd. He was promised that a shipping...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 21 APPLICANT FM RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. FM purchased some earbuds from T Ltd. After approximately 6 months the right earbud lost volume, so FM took them back to T Ltd. He was told there was detritus in the right earbud and given a cleaning guide, but found that cleani...
...apply merits and justice when reaching a decision and having done so I find the full rental cost should be paid. 4. For this reason I allow the claim. Referee: P McKinstry Date: 19 June 2024 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 429 APPLICANT TD Ltd RESPONDENT W Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. TD Ltd purchased flooring product from W Ltd which they installed in 10 tiny homes they built for customers. As the flooring product was being re-supplied in trade, the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 does not apply to the purchase. 2. T...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 697 APPLICANT QQ APPLICANT TO RESPONDENT FN The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. QQ and TO purchased a bracelet through a [website] from FN. They allege the bracelet was misrepresented and they wish to return the bracelet and receive a refund of the money they paid. 2. The issues I must decide are: a...
...THE MATTER of a referral under s48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY Immigration Advisers Authority Authority BETWEEN JM Complainant AND AHX Adviser FOR PUBLICATION COPY DECISION APPLICATION FOR REHEARING REPRESENTATION: Adviser In person Date Issued: Monday 11 April 2011 2 Decision [1] In a decision dated 21 January 2011, the Tribunal upheld the complaint in t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 204 APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT TB Ltd The Tribunal orders: TB Ltd is to pay to KD the sum of $1,307.38 on or before Monday, 8 August 2022. Reasons 1. TB Ltd operates [service station]. As part of its business, it hires out trailers owned by VS. On 15 May 2022, KD went to [service station] to hire a trailer. The hi...
...[Claim for interest on weekly compensation – s 114(1), Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal against the decision of a Reviewer dated 24 February 2023. The review related to Mr Smith’s review application, dated 27 September 2022, claiming backdated interest on late payments of weekly compensation for the period from 4 October 1991 to December 2004. 2 Background [2] Mr Smith was born in 1948. [3] In January 1990, Mr Smith...
...panel repair shop on the 31 March 2022 and the 1 April 2022 seeking a quote for the repair of the left door and panel? Can BC claim ownership and privacy of the of the dashcam footage left with the vehicle from after the 29 March when the contract is claimed to have formed? c. Was the sale offered “as is where is” and accepted by ND. d. As a bailee of the truck, has BC failed to use reasonable care and skill to secure the safekeeping of the goods? e. Was BC under a duty to...