12972 items matching your search terms
IGOR GRIGOROVICH v PRECISE LIMITED [2020] NZEmpC 71 [27 May 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 71 EMPC 49/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to adduce further evidence BETWEEN IGOR GRIGOROVICH App...
...APPLICANT AND ABP SECOND APPLICANT AND ZYP RESPONDENT Date of Order: 2 April 2013 Referee: Referee Haronga ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Applicants’ claim is dismissed. Facts [1] ABO and ABP bought a second-hand washing machine from ZYP on Trade Me for $150 plus delivery fee of $40. One month later the machine stopped working. They asked ZYP to either replace or re...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 610 BETWEEN AI APPLICANT AND ZR Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 7 August 2014 Referee: Referee Blyth ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] On 8 October 2013 the Police seized and impounded a car driven by the applicant’s son (AA). The Police issued a “Vehicle seizure and impoundment notice” (the notice) which stated the “Driver’s full...
Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 218 APPLICANT KM RESPONDENT NT OTHER PARTY S Ltd Result of application for rehearing: Rehearing Refused The Order of 17 August 2023 stands. Reasons for decision: 1. KM brought a claim in the Disputes Tribunal against NT and S Ltd. 2. On 17 August 2023 I dismissed KM’s claim as he did not attend the face to face hearing to present hi...
...1451 APPLICANT EM APPLICANT LM RESPONDENT KQ The Tribunal orders: KQ is to pay EM and LM the sum of $2,092.93 on or before 5pm on 26 April 2021. Reasons 1. On 24 December 2020 KQ provided a quote to EM and LM (the applicants) for the painting of their house at [address] (the house). The applicants accepted the quote on 24 December 2020. The applicants made three payments as follows: 14 January 2021, 25 January 2021 and 29 January 2021, each for $2,300....
...deposit. The Invoice clearly states the payment represents 50% of the accepted quote as per the Terms and Conditions. Both parties agree the original price agreed between them was $4,538.77. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 7. A contract can be formed orally or in writing. Terms of contract are those that are agreed prior. I find that there was a contract between the parties and that the term of the contract as to price was in writing. Contract terms can be varied by agreement...
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND Decision [2022] NZEnvC 023 an application for a declaration under s 310 of the Resource Management Act 1991 MHKARMAKAR (ENV-2022-AKL-17) Applicant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Judge J A Smith (sitting alone) Hearing: Last case event: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: Auckland Environment Court 1 7 February 2022 23 February 2022 24 Februar...
...further particulars in the Employment Court Regulations, rule 185 of the High Court Rules applies. The settled principles from authorities relating to that rule are that there must be sufficient particulars in a statement of claim to: • Inform the other party of the nature of the case as distinguished from the mode in which the case will be proved.1 • Prevent surprise. • Enable the preparation of evidence. • Limit and define the issues. [5] The difference between fact...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 159 APPLICANT SM RESPONDENT UU Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by telephone. Both parties appeared at the hearing. [2] The hearing was adjourned to allow SM to contact his insurer. SM has done so and reports that an insurance assessor has visited the propert...
...Industries Ltd 36 7. CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE 37 7.8 BETTERMENT 41 8. CONTRIBUTION BETWEEN PARTIES 43 9. COSTS 47 10. ORDERS 48 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 On 9 January 2003 the Claimant made application to the Weathertight Homes Resolution Service (“WHRS”) under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 (the Act) in respect of their property at 5A Kepler Place, Te Anau. * correction made 26.9.2006 2 Claim 6...